Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coronel, F.
Right arrow Articles by Valle, M. J. d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coronel, F.
Right arrow Articles by Valle, M. J. d.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1845-1849
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Long-term experience with the Thomas shunt, the forgotten permanent vascular access for haemodialysis

Francisco Coronel1,, José A. Herrero1, Pablo Mateos1, María L. Illescas1, Jaime Torrente1 and María J. del Valle2

1 Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, and 2 Hemodialysis Unit ICN-Moncloa, Madrid, Spain

Background. Vascular access complications are the main cause of hospitalization in dialysis patients. The difficulty in creating and maintaining vascular access after several years on haemodialysis (HD) remains the primary problem in these patients. The femoro–femoral Thomas shunt is a permanent vascular access that was used in the 1970s and is all but forgotten at present. We analysed our experience with the Thomas shunt since 1979 in patients with no other possibility of regular vascular access.

Methods. We retrospectively studied 27 Thomas shunts implanted in 10 patients, aged 27–75 years at the time of first shunt implantation. Prior to implantation of the Thomas shunt, these patients had experienced 80 failed vascular accesses (plus four patients on CAPD), with an average of 8.6 accesses per patient. All Thomas shunts were implanted in femoral vessels. Clinical data were extracted from hospital and dialysis unit records and were analysed for efficacy, complications, and duration of patency.

Results. Total follow-up was 1176 months, with an average shunt duration of 43.7 months (range 3–151 months). One-, 2-, 3- and 6-year survival rates were 85, 57, 49 and 25% respectively. Five patients spent more than 10 years on HD using the Thomas shunt, and one patient had the same unit for 12.5 years. A high blood flow (450 ml/min) was obtained, without recirculation, due to the characteristics of this shunt. Efficacy, measured as percentage urea reduction (PRU), was high (on average 77.8±1.5%). The infection incidence was one episode every 37.5 patient-months, Staphylococcus species being the most commonly isolated. There were no shunt removals because of infection. The most important cause of shunt withdrawal was thrombosis, with an incidence of one episode every 7 patient-months. Percutaneous angioplasty was successful in the majority of stenosis episodes.

Conclusions. This study indicates that the Thomas shunt provides a good permanent vascular access for HD patients who have no other possibility of a regular vascular access. This shunt offers high dialysis efficacy without recirculation and an access duration comparable to AV fistulae. For these reasons the Thomas shunt should continue to be used as a vascular access in HD.

Keywords: arteriovenous shunt; dialysis efficacy; femoro–femoral shunt; haemodialysis; permanent access; vascular access

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Francisco Coronel MD PhD, Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/ Dr Martín Lagos s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Konner
History of vascular access for haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 2629 - 2635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. M. Peirce, B. Funaki, T. G. Van Ha, and J. M. Lorenz
Percutaneous Declotting of Virgin Femoral Hemodialysis Grafts
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1615 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.