Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoves, J.
Right arrow Articles by Newstead, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoves, J.
Right arrow Articles by Newstead, C. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 967-974
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

A randomized study of oral vs intravenous iron supplementation in patients with progressive renal insufficiency treated with erythropoietin

John Stoves, Helen Inglis and Charles G. Newstead

Department of Nephrology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK

Background. Correction of anaemia as a result of renal failure improves cardiovascular function and also provides significant cognitive and emotional benefits. The most appropriate route for iron supplementation has not been determined for patients with chronic renal failure who are not yet on dialysis.

Methods. Forty-five anaemic patients with progressive renal insufficiency (PRI) were prospectively randomized to receive oral (ferrous sulphate 200 mg tds) or intravenous (300 mg iron sucrose monthly) iron treatment. Erythropoietin (rHuEpo) was simultaneously commenced and the dose adjusted according to a pre-established protocol.

Results. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. The average follow-up was 5.2 months. Three patients suffered possible allergic reactions to iron sucrose. Haemoglobin response and changes in red cell hypochromasia were similar in the two groups, but serum ferritin was significantly higher in the intravenous group. The starting dose of rHuEpo could be temporarily discontinued in 43% of patients on oral iron and 33% of patients receiving iron sucrose (NS). rHuEpo was increased after 3 months in 9% of patients on oral iron and 19% of patients receiving iron sucrose (NS). Final doses of rHuEpo were 33.5 (0–66) and 41.6 (0–124) U/kg/week respectively in the oral and intravenous groups (NS). Although gastro-intestinal symptoms were more commonly reported in patients taking oral iron, these were mild according to scores on visual analogue scales. Dietary protein and energy intake were not significantly different in the two groups at 0, 3 and 6 months.

Conclusions. In pre-dialysis patients, the efficacy of monthly 300 mg iron sucrose given intravenously is not superior with regard to haemoglobin response and rHuEpo dose as compared with a daily oral dose of 600 mg of ferrous sulphate or equivalent. Where intravenous iron is preferred, lower doses may help to reduce the incidence of allergic or ‘free iron’ reactions, especially in patients with low body mass.

Keywords: anaemia; ferritin; haemoglobin; iron; iron sucrose; progressive renal insufficiency

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr J. Stoves, Department of Renal Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. P. McMahon, A. B. Kent, P. G. Kerr, H. Healy, A. B. Irish, B. Cooper, A. Kark, and S. D. Roger
Maintenance of elevated versus physiological iron indices in non-anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 10, 2009; (2009) gfp584v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Besarab, W. H. Horl, and D. Silverberg
Iron Metabolism, Iron Deficiency, Thrombocytosis, and the Cardiorenal Anemia Syndrome
Oncologist, September 1, 2009; 14(suppl_1): 22 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. H. Horl
Clinical Aspects of Iron Use in the Anemia of Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 382 - 393.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. M. Hollands, E. F. Foote, A. Rodriguez, J. Rothschild, and S. Young
Safety of high-dose iron sucrose infusion in hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 15, 2006; 63(8): 731 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Mircescu, L. Garneata, C. Capusa, and N. Ursea
Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of anaemia in pre-dialyzed chronic renal failure patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 120 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.