Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coupes, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brenchley, P. E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coupes, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brenchley, P. E. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 361-367
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Plasma transforming growth factor ß1 and platelet activation: implications for studies in transplant recipients

Beatrice M. Coupes, Shelley Williams, Ian S. D. Roberts1, Colin D. Short and Paul E. C. Brenchley

Renal Research Laboratories, Manchester Institute of Nephrology and Transplantation, The Royal Infirmary, Manchester, and 1 Laboratory Medicine Academic Group, University of Manchester, UK

Background. Evidence from animal models supports the hypothesis that dysregulated transforming growth factor ß1 (TGFß1) expression plays a role in chronic allograft rejection, the progression of diabetic nephropathy and fibrotic glomerulopathies. However, more evidence is required to support this hypothesis in man, and the current literature concerning blood TGFß1 levels in clinical studies is highly confused. We have investigated: (i) the hypothesis that the widespread practice of activating clinical samples prior to measurement of TGFß1 is detecting the platelet-released pool of TGFß1, artefactually generated on venepuncture and unrepresentative of the real circulating in vivo TGFß1 pool; and (ii) the effect of different immunosuppressive drugs on apparent TGFß1 plasma levels.

Methods. The effect of two different venepuncture procedures on plasma TGFß1 was compared in 10 healthy volunteers, one procedure designed to minimize platelet activation and the other representing standard venepuncture practice in a clinic situation. Blood samples from 52 renal transplant recipients on either cyclosporine or tacrolimus immunosuppression were taken by standard venepuncture to investigate the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on plasma TGFß1. Plasma TGFß1 and ß thromboglobulin were measured by ELISA.

Results. Among 10 healthy volunteers who underwent two different methods of venepuncture, eight of 10 had undetectable levels of TGFß1 (<100 pg/ml) under conditions that minimize platelet activation. In contrast, all 10 paired plasma samples collected by vacutainer had measurable TGFß1 (median 7.70 ng/ml, interquartile range 5.87–13.64 ng/ml) following acid/ urea activation. The median ßTG level (a measure of platelet degranulation) was 0.71 µg/ml (interquartile range 0.53–1.19 µg/ml) in the special collections compared with 3.39 µg/ml (interquartile range 2.27–4.33 µg/ml) in the vacutainer samples (P=0.0029).

Among 52 allograft recipients there was a significantly higher mean TGFß1 level in plasma from patients on cyclosporine therapy compared with patients on tacrolimus (28 090±26 860 pg/ml vs 7173±10 610 pg/ml, respectively; P<0.002). Mean plasma ßTG levels were also significantly higher during cyclosporine therapy compared with tacrolimus (8.14±5.54 µg/ml vs 3.66±3.32 µg/ml, respectively; P<0.002). However, when TGFß1 values were corrected for the degree of platelet activation (by factoring with ßTG) there was no significant difference between TGFß1 levels on cyclosporine or tacrolimus (4117±2993 pg/µg ßTG vs 2971±658 pg/µg ßTG, respectively; P=0.294).

Conclusions. To avoid erroneous hypotheses concerning TGFß1 and perpetuating confusion in the literature over levels in health and disease, it is imperative that proper internal controls for platelet activation are used. The effects of experimental treatments and drugs on platelet biology must be rigorously controlled when attempting to measure and interpret plasma levels of TGFß1 in clinical practice.

Keywords: immunosuppression; platelets; renal allografts; TGFß1; immunoassay

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr PEC Brenchley, Renal Research Labs, Manchester Institute of Nephrology and Transplantation, The Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
J. E. Dierksheide, R. A. Baiocchi, A. K. Ferketich, S. Roychowdhury, R. P. Pelletier, C. F. Eisenbeis, M. A. Caligiuri, and A. M. VanBuskirk
IFN-{gamma} gene polymorphisms associate with development of EBV+ lymphoproliferative disease in hu PBL-SCID mice
Blood, February 15, 2005; 105(4): 1558 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.