Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenda, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ponikvar, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenda, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ponikvar, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 2229-2231
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Cyclic voiding urosonography for detecting vesicoureteric reflux in renal transplant recipients

Rajko B. Kenda1,, Anton Kenig2, Gregor Novljan1, Rafael Ponikvar3 and Jadranka Buturovic Ponikvar3

1 Department of Pediatric Nephrology, 2 Department of Pediatric Radiology and 3 Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Background. The clinical significance of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) in renal transplant recipients remains controversial. Voiding urosonography (VUS), a new modality for detecting VUR, can be used in these patients. The sensitivity of X-ray and radionuclide cystography for detecting VUR may be improved with cyclic procedures. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether cyclic VUS is superior to the single-cycle procedure.

Methods. Cyclic VUS was performed in 27 renal transplant recipients. Eight were children or adolescents and the remaining 19 recipients were adults. VUS was performed according to accepted guidelines. After the first micturition, the catheter was left in place and the entire procedure was repeated under the same conditions.

Results. Both initial cycle and cyclic VUS detected 17 out of 27 (63%) VURs in the same patients. The sensitivity was not improved by cyclic VUS. However, there were differences between the initial cycle and cyclic VUS (P=0.028) when comparing the number of negative results and the grades of VURs detected. This difference was even more pronounced when analysing only positive results. In the initial cycle, five out of 17 (29%) VURs were grade III, compared with 10 out of 17 (59%) grade III VURs in the same patients using the cyclic procedure (P=0.008).

Conclusions. Cyclic VUS did not improve the detection sensitivity for VUR in our study. However, given that VUR grade may be important for the management of renal transplant recipients, the use of cyclic VUS may provide a useful diagnostic tool for these patients.

Keywords: cyclic voiding urosonography; renal transplant recipients; vesicoureteric reflux

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Rajko Kenda, MD DSc, Head, Department of Nephrology, Pediatric Hospital, University Medical Center, Stare pravde 4, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Email: rajko.kenda{at}mf.uni\|[hyphen]\|lj.si


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. L. Valentini, A. M. De Gaetano, L. M. Minordi, G. Nanni, F. Citterio, A. M. Viggiano, V. Tancioni, and C. Destito
Contrast-enhanced Voiding US for Grading of Reflux in Adult Patients Prior to Antireflux Ureteral Implantation
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 35 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.