Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 2194-2200
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

A prospective study of complications associated with cuffed, tunnelled haemodialysis catheters{dagger}

Mark A. Little1, Aisling O'Riordan1, Brian Lucey2, Michael Farrell2, Michael Lee2, Peter J. Conlon1 and J. Joseph Walshe1,

1 Department of Nephrology and Transplantation and 2 Department of Interventional Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Background. Despite the US Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative )DOQI( guidelines, for various reasons, increasing numbers of end-stage renal disease patients are becoming dependent on cuffed haemodialysis catheters (HCs) for chronic haemodialysis access. Their use is complicated by frequent failure due to thrombosis and catheter-related sepsis. In our unit, all HCs are put in place by the radiology department.

Methods. In a prospective study we looked at the outcome of all HCs over a three-year period, during which time 573 consecutive HCs were placed in 336 patients. Each line was followed individually until it was removed or until the end of the study.

Results. In a survival analysis of those HCs removed following HC failure, HC half-life was 312 days and one-year HC survival was 47.5%. The most frequent indications for HC removal were non-function (36.6%), clinical suspicion of line sepsis (16.4%) and patient death (14.4%). Using a Cox proportional hazards model, catheter number in a given patient and the presence of diabetes mellitus were found to be independent predictors of HC failure. The total incidence of HC-related sepsis was 1.3 episodes/1000 catheter days. The probability of developing bacteraemic HC-related sepsis was 27.5% at one year.

Conclusions. Less than half of the HCs were removed electively because of availability of a more permanent mode of renal replacement, thereby illustrating the level of dependence that has developed on them as permanent access. Consequently, their limitations (infection and malfunction) are placing an ever increasing burden on the healthcare services.

Keywords: cuffed haemodialysis catheter; infection; survival; thrombosis

{dagger} Presented in part at XXXVI ERA-EDTA Annual Congress, Madrid, September 1999.

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Prof. J. Joseph Walshe, Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland. Email: joseph.walshe{at}beaumont.ie


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Winnett, J. Nolan, M. Miller, and N. Ashman
Trisodium citrate 46.7% selectively and safely reduces staphylococcal catheter-related bacteraemia
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 3592 - 3598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. C. Weijmer, M. G. Vervloet, and P. M. ter Wee
Prospective follow-up of a novel design haemodialysis catheter; lower infection rates and improved survival
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 977 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Wang, J. M. LaBerge, G. M. Chertow, R. K. Kerlan, M. W. Wilson, and R. L. Gordon
Tesio Catheter Access for Long-term Maintenance Hemodialysis
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 284 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
D. G. Maki, D. M. Kluger, and C. J. Crnich
The Risk of Bloodstream Infection in Adults With Different Intravascular Devices: A Systematic Review of 200 Published Prospective Studies
Mayo Clin. Proc., September 1, 2006; 81(9): 1159 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. C. Weijmer, M. A. van den Dorpel, P. J.G. Van de Ven, P. M. ter Wee, J. A.C.A. van Geelen, J. O. Groeneveld, B. C. van Jaarsveld, M. G. Koopmans, C. Y. le Poole, A. M. Schrander-Van der Meer, et al.
Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparison of Trisodium Citrate 30% and Heparin as Catheter-Locking Solution in Hemodialysis Patients
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2005; 16(9): 2769 - 2777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. C. Weijmer, M. G. Vervloet, and P. M. ter Wee
Compared to tunnelled cuffed haemodialysis catheters, temporary untunnelled catheters are associated with more complications already within 2 weeks of use
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 670 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. W. McIntyre, M. W. Taal, R. J. Fluck, and D. Hinwood
Adherence of tunnelled haemodialysis catheter to superior vena caval stent: successful percutaneous removal
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 432 - 433.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.