Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higuchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kanmatsuse, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higuchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kanmatsuse, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 151-155
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Brief Reports

Intravascular ultrasound imaging before and after angioplasty for stenosis of arteriovenous fistulae in haemodialysis patients

Terumi Higuchi,1, Naohiro Okuda1, Kyouko Aoki1, Yoshiyuki Ishii2, Hidetoshi Matsumoto3, Yoshihiko Ohnishi1, Chihiro Hagi1, Fumito Kikuchi1, Kazuyoshi Okada1, Tsutomu Kuno1, Junko Honye1, Satoshi Saito1, Yuji Nagura1, Susumu Takahashi1 and Katsuo Kanmatsuse1

1 Second Department of Internal Medicine, 2 Second Department of Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 3 Goodman Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan

Background. Complications of haemodialysis vascular access have emerged as a major cause of patient morbidity. Intravascular ultrasound imaging is a new technical modality providing visualization of the vessel lumen and wall structure in a cross-sectional fashion. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has long been used in the treatment of stenoses of arteriovenous fistulae. However, there is no detailed quantitative information on the stenotic lesion and the morphological change by angioplasty.

Methods. Intravascular ultrasound studies were performed in 40 haemodialysis patients with 63 stenoses in arteriovenous fistulae who had percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The patients were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated for echogenic patterns and morphological changes before and after angioplasty.

Results. Morphological plaque features in stenotic lesions were classified as 37 soft (58%), five hard (8%), 20 mixed (32%), and one calcified sites. Plaque fractures after angioplasty were detected in 45/63 (71%) instances. The lumen cross-sectional area was found to be dilated approximately threefold (from 3.8±2.4 to 11.1±4.5 mm2) and the external elastic membrane cross-sectional area was dilated approximately twofold (from 11.1±5.3 to 19.8±8.1 mm2) after angioplasty.

Conclusion. These results indicate that intravascular ultrasound allows both qualitative and quantitative assessments of arteriovenous fistulae in haemodialysis patients. The results further suggest that the mechanism of expansion of arteriovenous fistulae stenoses by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty involves stretching of the vessel wall as well as plaque fractures.

Keywords: arteriovenous fistulae; haemodialysis patients; intravascular ultrasound imaging; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Terumi Higuchi, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi-Kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0032, Japan.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Funaki, R. Kim, J. Lorenz, D. Fimmen, T. Van Ha, J. A. Leef, J. D. Rosenblum, C. Straus, and G. X. Zaleski
Using Pullback Pressure Measurements to Identify Venous Stenoses Persisting After Successful Angioplasty in Failing Hemodialysis Grafts
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1161 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.