Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kmetec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buturovic-Ponikvar, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kmetec, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buturovic-Ponikvar, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 120-123
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound voiding cystography as a screening examination for vesicoureteral reflux in the follow-up of renal transplant recipients: a new approach

Andrej Kmetec, Andrej F. Bren1, Aljosa Kandus1, Jurij Fettich2 and Jadranka Buturovic-Ponikvar1

Department of Urology, 1 Department of Nephrology and 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Background. The aim of the study was to evaluate a new diagnostic procedure, ultrasound contrast-enhanced voiding cystography (USVC), for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in renal transplant recipients and to compare it with radionuclide voiding cystography (RVC).

Methods. Twenty-three renal transplant recipients with recurrent urinary tract infection were investigated simultaneously by RVC and USVC. After catheterization, the empty bladder was filled with normal saline (mean 250±30 ml) and 30–45 mBq of 99mTc-labelled colloid. At the end of filling the bladder, 19.5 ml of galactose-based, microbubble-containing echo-enhancing agent, at a concentration of 200 mg/ml, was instilled. During the filling and voiding phases the movement of the radiotracer was recorded by a gamma camera and the presence of microbubbles in the urinary tract by ultrasound. RVC was used to detecte and grade the degree of VUR.

Results. Nuclear studies identified VUR in 16 (69.6%) of 23 recipients with recurrent urinary tract infection: VUR grade I in three (13%) recipients, grade II in eight (34.8%) and grade III in five (21.7%) using a simplified grading system. USVC with contrast-enhancement detected VUR in 14 (60.9%) recipients. Overall sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced USVC was 75 and 71%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that the accuracy of this procedure increased with higher grades of VUR and its sensitivity reached 100% for detection of VUR grade III.

Conclusion. In our preliminary study, contrast-enhanced USVC has proved to be an effective examination, with the same accuracy rate as RVC in detecting grade III VUR episodes with low diagnostic accuracy for low reflux grades.

Keywords: contrast-enhanced ultrasound; renal transplantation; vesicoureteric reflux; voiding cystography

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Andrej Kmetec, MD, Department for Urology, University Medical Centre, Zaloska 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Darge, B. Zieger, W. Rohrschneider, S. Ghods, R. Wunsch, and J. Troeger
Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Imaging for the Diagnosis of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Pediatric Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1411 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. B. Kenda, A. Kenig, G. Novljan, R. Ponikvar, and J. B. Ponikvar
Cyclic voiding urosonography for detecting vesicoureteric reflux in renal transplant recipients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2229 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.