Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ledebo, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ledebo, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 45-48
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Acid–base correction and convective dialysis therapies

Ingrid Ledebo

Gambro Research, Lund, Sweden

Whichever dialysis therapy is used, there is a similar need for correcting the acid–base balance. The most important tool for this is the buffer in the dialysis fluid and, when using convective therapies, also in the substitution solution. The buffer source in all modern versions of these therapies should be bicarbonate. The more efficient the dialysis treatment in terms of small solute transport, the more rapid the uptake of buffer. Thus, optimally applied haemodiafiltration has the potential for the largest buffer gain. The target for acid–base correction in dialysis is to maintain patients within or as close to the physiological plasma bicarbonate range as possible. However, cross-sectional studies of acid–base status among patients treated with contemporary forms of dialysis often show moderate acidosis. As metabolic acidosis has been found to be an important stimulus for protein catabolism in experimental studies, an association with nutritional problems has been sought in dialysis patients. This has revealed a negative correlation between plasma bicarbonate and nutritional parameters. Acidotic patients were found to have better nutritional status than patients with normalized acid–base balance. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting plasma bicarbonate levels, since acidosis may be a cause as well as an effect of excessive protein catabolism. Although available clinical data suggest that the catabolic effect of mild acidosis can be compensated by adequate nutrition and adequate dialysis, it should be desirable to aim for a normalized acid–base balance in combination with adequate nutritional intake and delivery of dialysis.

Keywords: acidosis; bicarbonate; convection; haemodiafiltration; haemofiltration

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Ingrid Ledebo, PhD, Gambro Research, Box 10101, S 220 10 Lund, Sweden.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.