Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wizemann, V.
Right arrow Articles by Uthoff, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wizemann, V.
Right arrow Articles by Uthoff, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 43-48
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Clinical Evaluation and Experience in Treatment Modalities

On-line haemodiafiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis. A prospective randomized study

V. Wizemann,1, C. Lotz1, F. Techert1 and S. Uthoff2

1 Georg-Haas-Dialysezenlrum, Giessen and 2 Fresenius MC, Bad-Homburg, Germany

Abstract

Background. Current methods of renal replacement therapy lead only to an insignificant removal of larger, potentially toxic, substances, which are excreted by healthy kidneys. On-line preparation of substituate from dialysate and the use of high-flux membranes allow substantial convective removal of such substances. A modified on-line haemodiafiltration method with the use of a large membrane surface and a high convective part was chosen to test whether the elimination of larger substances, such as low- molecular-mass proteins, has a clinical impact.

Methods. In a prospective, controlled study over 24 months, 44 unselected chronic dialysis patients were randomized to undergo either low-flux haemodialysis (HD; n=21) or haemodiafiltration (HDF; n=23). To eliminate confounding factors, low-molecular efficacy was matched (Kt/V 1.8), and the same membrane material (polysulfone), ultrapure dialysate and the same treatment duration (4.5 h) were applied to each group.

Results. Morbidity, mortality, blood pressure, dialysis-associated hypotensive episodes, haematocrit and erythropoietin dose did not differ between the groups. The same was true for body weight and, accordingly, bioimpedance values, clinical hydration score, skinfold thickness, plasma albumin, prealbumin and transferrin. ß2-Microglobulin in the plasma did not change in the HD group and varied between 32 and 43 mg/l throughout the 2 years. In HDF ß2 microglobulin decreased from similar values to 18 mg/l predialysis (P<0.01) in the first 6 months of HDF treatment and then remained constant during the remaining 18 months.

Conclusion. In the absence of any clinical marker of uraemic toxicity the removal of larger molecules over the time-span of 2 years during HDF had no clinical implication compared with extremely (and for routine practice unrealistically) well-dialysed patients with low-flux HD. In the absence of any side-effects of on-line HDF and supposing that plasma ß2-microglobulin is a marker of morbidity, on-line HDF ensures an excellent dialysis quality which apparently takes time to translate into measurable clinical sequelae.

Notes

Correspondence and offprint requests to: V. Wizemann, Georg-Haas-Dialysezentrum, Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Str 40, D-35392 Giessen, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
V. Gura, A. S. Macy, M. Beizai, C. Ezon, and T. A. Golper
Technical Breakthroughs in the Wearable Artificial Kidney (WAK)
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2009; 4(9): 1441 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Okuno, E. Ishimura, K. Kohno, Y. Fujino-Katoh, Y. Maeno, T. Yamakawa, M. Inaba, and Y. Nishizawa
Serum {beta}2-microglobulin level is a significant predictor of mortality in maintenance haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 571 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Panichi, G. M. Rizza, S. Paoletti, R. Bigazzi, M. Aloisi, G. Barsotti, P. Rindi, G. Donati, A. Antonelli, E. Panicucci, et al.
Chronic inflammation and mortality in haemodialysis: effect of different renal replacement therapies. Results from the RISCAVID study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2337 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. C. van der Weerd, E. L. Penne, M. A. van den Dorpel, M. P.C. Grooteman, M. J. Nube, M. L. Bots, P. M. ter Wee, and P. J. Blankestijn
Haemodiafiltration: promise for the future?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 438 - 443.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Feliciani, M. A. Riva, S. Zerbi, P. Ruggiero, A. R. Plati, G. Cozzi, and L. A. Pedrini
New strategies in haemodiafiltration (HDF): prospective comparative analysis between on-line mixed HDF and mid-dilution HDF
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1672 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.