Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Nandakumar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woods, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Nandakumar, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 36-42
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Clinical Evaluation and Experience in Treatment Modalities

Improved outcome for haemodialysis patients treated with high-flux membranes

H. F. Woods and M. Nandakumar

National Kidney Foundation, Singapore

Abstract

Improved survival for haemodialysis patients has been reported for synthetic, high-flux biocompatible membranes. The reported data fail to answer the question whether improved survival is related to an effect of enhanced biocompatibility or to increased clearance of larger molecular species of putative uraemic toxins. A retrospective analysis of 715 patients treated by continuous haemodialysis for up to 5 years was undertaken. Low-flux polysulfone dialysis was used exclusively for 252 patients and 463 patients were exposed for at least 3 months to high-flux polysulfone dialysis. Patients treated with high-flux dialysis had a lower mortality (21 vs 36 per 1000 years) and significantly lower standardized mortality ratio. For nondiabetic patients the 5-year probability of survival was significantly greater for high-flux patients (Kaplan–Meier: 92% vs 69%; P=0.036). High-flux dialysis significantly reduced the adverse effect of age on survival. In a Cox proportional hazard model membrane flux (high vs low) was one of the covariates with strong predictor value for reduction of death risk in non-diabetic patients. Although other variables may explain the better survival of patients exposed to high-flux dialysis the data reported here suggest that higher membrane flux, implying higher clearance of larger molecular species and independent of biocompatibility, is associated with improved survival for haemodialysis patients.

Notes

Correspondence and offprint requests to: M. Nandakumar, National Kidney Foundation, Singapore, 81 Kim Keat Road, Singapore 328 836.

* H. F. Woods is currently employed as Vice President, Medical, Fresenius Medical Care Asia Pacific.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Okuno, E. Ishimura, K. Kohno, Y. Fujino-Katoh, Y. Maeno, T. Yamakawa, M. Inaba, and Y. Nishizawa
Serum {beta}2-microglobulin level is a significant predictor of mortality in maintenance haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 571 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
R. Vanholder, S. V. Laecke, F. Verbeke, G. Glorieux, and W. V. Biesen
Uraemic toxins and cardiovascular disease: in vitro research versus clinical outcome studies
NDT Plus, February 1, 2008; 1(1): 2 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Mircescu, L. Garneata, C. Capusa, and N. Ursea
Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of anaemia in pre-dialyzed chronic renal failure patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 120 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.