Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexopoulos, E.
Right arrow Articles by Papadimitriou, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexopoulos, E.
Right arrow Articles by Papadimitriou, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1348-1356
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Factors influencing the course and the response to treatment in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Efstathios Alexopoulos1,, Maria Stangou1, Aikaterini Papagianni1, Aphroditi Pantzaki2 and Menelaos Papadimitriou1

1 Departments of Nephrology and 2 Departments of Pathology, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Background. The clinical course of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) varies and there is considerable controversy as to which factors are of importance in determining prognosis or response to therapy. The aim of this study was to identify clinical, pathological or immunohistochemical features at biopsy that could identify patients with progressive disease who might benefit from treatment, and predict long-term outcome.

Methods. The clinical and pathological findings of 33 adult patients with primary FSGS were retrospectively analysed in order to identify features at biopsy that could be predictive of outcome or response to treatment. For this purpose an immunohistochemical study was also performed, using monoclonal antibodies against intracellular adhesion molecules-1, C5b-9, {alpha}3ß1 integrin, {alpha}-smooth-muscle actin (SMA), and TGF-ß1.

Results. At biopsy 17 patients (51%) were nephrotic and 16 (49%) non-nephrotic. Of the nephrotic patients, 11 were treated and six received only symptomatic therapy. Initial treatment with prednisolone (Pred) for 6–12 months (average 9 months) resulted in remission in 64% of nephrotic patients. To those with partial or no response, cyclosporin (CsA) or cyclophosphamide was given. At the end of follow-up (mean 57 months) three nephrotic patients (28%) were in complete remission, six (54%) in partial remission, and two (18%) did not respond to the treatment. In the seven treated non-nephrotic patients, Pred induced a complete remission in two (28%), a partial remission in three (44%), while two patients (28%) did not respond. Plasma creatinine remained stable in nephrotic patients who responded and it almost doubled in non-responders. Plasma creatinine also remained unchanged in treated non-nephrotic patients who responded to Pred, while two non-responders reached end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In contrast, 50% of untreated nephrotic patients and 67% of untreated non-nephrotic patients progressed to ESRD. Multivariate analysis showed only age and plasma creatinine at biopsy to have an independent predictive value for renal survival in nephrotic patients. This analysis also demonstrated that only the severity of interstitial fibrosis predicted the response to the treatment. In addition, the tubulointerstitial but not the glomerular expression of C5b-9, {alpha}3ß1 integrin, {alpha}-SMA, and TGF-ß1 was significantly more extensive in non-responders and correlated with renal function at biopsy. However, only tubulointerstitial expression of TGF-ß1 independently correlated with the degree of renal function impairment at biopsy, but none of the above markers independently predicted renal survival or response to therapy.

Conclusions. Nephrotic patients with FSGS may benefit from a more prolonged course of Pred. Nephrotic patients responding to treatment have a significantly better renal survival than non-responders. Age and plasma creatinine at biopsy are independent risk factors leading to ESRD. The severity of tubulointerstitial fibrosis is predictive of response to therapy.

Keywords: cyclosporin; focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; nephrotic syndrome; prognosis; TGF-ß1; treatment

Correspondence and offprint requests to: E. Alexopoulos MD, Department of Nephrology, Hippokration General Hospital, 50 Papanastasiou str., 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
I. Mahmoud, F. Basuni, A. Sabry, A. El-Husseini, N. Hassan, N. S. Ahmad, M. Elbaz, F. Moustafa, and M. Sobh
Single-centre experience with cyclosporin in 106 children with idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 735 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Troyanov, C. A. Wall, J. A. Miller, J. W. Scholey, D. C. Cattran, and for the Toronto Glomerulonephritis Registry Group
Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Definition and Relevance of a Partial Remission
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1061 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
Y. Kanno, H. Okada, Y. Yamaji, Y. Nakazato, and H. Suzuki
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors slow renal decline in IgA nephropathy, independent of tubulointerstitial fibrosis at presentation
QJM, March 1, 2005; 98(3): 199 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Kveder
Therapy-resistant focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(90005): v34 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.