Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leitienne, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laville, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leitienne, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laville, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1631-1637
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Heparins and blood polymorphonuclear stimulation in haemodialysis: an expansion of the biocompatibility concept

Philippe Leitienne1,, Denis Fouque1, Dominique Rigal2, Patrice Adeleine3, Marie-Christine Trzeciak4 and Maurice Laville1

1 Centre d'Hémodialyse, Hôpital P. Wertheimer, et département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 2 Etablissement de Transfusion Sanguine, 3 Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale, Hôpitaux de Lyon and 4 Laboratoire d'Hémostase, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France

Background. At the concentrations used in haemodialysis and in a dose-dependent way, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and, to a lesser degree, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) stimulate polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) in vitro, and could act in synergy with the stimulatory effect of dialysis membranes in vivo.To examine this hypothesis, we studied the effects of different heparin types and regimens on blood PMNs during haemodialysis sessions.

Methods. Ten haemodialysed patients were studied during regular dialysis sessions on a cellulose triacetate membrane (CT 110 G; 1.10 m2; Baxter), with four different random heparin protocols: one high-UFH regimen (HHR) at 90 IU/kg body-weight (b.w.) and one low-UFH regimen (LHR) at 50 IU/kg b.w., and with a LMWH (nadroparin calcium) at 85 (HHR) or 45 (LHR) IU/kg b.w. Blood granulocytes, platelet counts, and plasma granulocyte degranulation products (elastase, lactoferrin) were measured serially during 4 h dialysis sessions.

Results. After 10 min, the reduction in PMNs with UFH was 29.5% for HHR (P<0.01) and 28.5% for LHR (P<0.01), and only 16.8 and 18.6% with LMWH (NS), significantly higher for HHR with UFH than with LMWH (P<0.01). At 60 min, the elastase increase with HHR was greater, 61% with UFH (P<0.01) and 37.8% with LMWH (P<0.01), significantly higher than LHR for UFH (P<0.05) or LMWH (P<0.05). The overall decrease in platelets (with LMWH P<0.01) and the overall increase in lactoferrin (P<0.001) were not different between heparinization procedures.

Conclusion. Under a conventional heparin regimen, the PMN variation during the course of the dialysis session suggests a more biocompatible effect of LMWH over UFH. In addition, the variation of elastase favours the lower dose, whatever the type of heparin. Heparin type and dose should therefore be considered in studies addressing biocompatibility in haemodialysis: a low dose of LMWH may be viewed as a better biocompatible treatment with regard to leukocyte stimulation.

Keywords: biocompatibility; elastase; haemodialysis; heparins; lactoferrin; polymorphonuclear cells

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Ph. Leitienne, Centre d'Hémodialyse, 52 boulevard Pinel, F-69003 Lyon, France.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Richtrova, K. Opatrny Jr, L. Vit, F. Sefrna, and R. Perlik
The AN69 ST haemodialysis membrane under conditions of two different extracorporeal circuit rinse protocols a comparison of thrombogenicity parameters
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2978 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Chanard, S. Lavaud, C. Randoux, and P. Rieu
New insights in dialysis membrane biocompatibility: relevance of adsorption properties and heparin binding
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 252 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.