Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (66)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lesaffer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lesaffer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 50-57
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Intradialytic removal of protein-bound uraemic toxins: role of solute characteristics and of dialyser membrane

Gerrit Lesaffer, Rita De Smet, Norbert Lameire, Annemieke Dhondt, Philippe Duym and Raymond Vanholder

Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Gerrit Lesaffer, Renal Division, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.

Background. The efficiency of dialysis membranes is generally evaluated by assessing their capacity to remove small, water-soluble and non-protein-bound reference markers such as urea or creatinine. However, recent data suggest that protein-bound and/or lipophilic substances might be responsible for biochemical alterations characterizing the uraemic syndrome.

Methods. In the present study, the total concentrations of four uraemic retention compounds (indoxyl sulphate, hippuric acid, 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF) and p-cresol) and of tryptophan, the only protein-bound amino acid and a precursor of indoxyl sulphate, were compared with those of urea and creatinine in pre- and post-dialysis serum and in dialysate of 10 patients; two high-flux (HF) membranes (cellulose triacetate (CTA) and polysulphone (PS)) and a low-flux polysulphone (LFPS) membrane were compared in a crossover design, using HPLC.

Results. Except for hippuric acid (67.3±17.5% decrease), major differences were found in the percentage removal of the classical uraemic markers on one hand (creatinine 66.6±7.0% and urea 75.5±5.8% decrease) and the studied protein-bound and/or lipophilic substances on the other (indoxyl sulphate, 35.4±15.3% and p-cresol 29.0±14.2% decrease; tryptophan, 27.5±40.3%, and CMPF, 22.4±17.5% increase; P<0.01 vs urea and creatinine in all cases). Hippuric acid removal was more pronounced than that of the remaining protein-bound compounds (P<0.01). After correction for haemoconcentration, per cent increase of tryptophan and CMPF was less substantial, while per cent negative changes for the remaining compounds became more important. There was a correlation between creatinine and urea per cent removal at min 240 (r=0.51, P<0.01), but all the other compounds showed no significant correlation with either of these two. The three membranes were similar regarding the changes of total solute concentrations from the start to the end of dialysis.

Conclusions. Urea and creatinine are far more efficiently removed than the other compounds under study, except for hippuric acid. There are no striking differences between the HF membranes. Moreover, compared with the LF membrane these HF membranes do not appear to be superior in removing the studied compounds.

Keywords: cellulose triacetate; dialysis membrane; haemodialysis; polysulphone; protein binding; removal; tryptophan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. H Krieter, A. Hackl, A. Rodriguez, L. Chenine, H. Leray Moragues, H.-D. Lemke, C. Wanner, and B. Canaud
Protein-bound uraemic toxin removal in haemodialysis and post-dilution haemodiafiltration
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 15, 2009; (2009) gfp437v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. C. Schefold, J.-P. Zeden, C. Fotopoulou, S. von Haehling, R. Pschowski, D. Hasper, H.-D. Volk, C. Schuett, and P. Reinke
Increased indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) activity and elevated serum levels of tryptophan catabolites in patients with chronic kidney disease: a possible link between chronic inflammation and uraemic symptoms
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1901 - 1908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Meert, S. Eloot, M.-A. Waterloos, M. Van Landschoot, A. Dhondt, G. Glorieux, I. Ledebo, and R. Vanholder
Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 562 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Nishio, N. Takamura, R. Nishii, J. Tokunaga, M. Yoshimoto, and K. Kawai
Influences of haemodialysis on the binding sites of human serum albumin: possibility of an efficacious administration plan using binding inhibition
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2304 - 2310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Vanholder and L. A. Pedrini
All high-flux membranes are equal but some high-flux membranes are less equal than others
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1481 - 1483.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Vanholder, N. Meert, E. Schepers, G. Glorieux, A. Argiles, P. Brunet, G. Cohen, T. Drueke, H. Mischak, G. Spasovski, et al.
Review on uraemic solutes II Variability in reported concentrations: causes and consequences
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 3115 - 3121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. W. Meyer and T. H. Hostetter
Uremia
N. Engl. J. Med., September 27, 2007; 357(13): 1316 - 1325.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. De Smet, A. Dhondt, S. Eloot, F. Galli, M. A. Waterloos, and R. Vanholder
Effect of the super-flux cellulose triacetate dialyser membrane on the removal of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uraemic solutes
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2006 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
C. Kum, S. Sekkin, F. Kiral, and F. Akar
Effects of xylene and formaldehyde inhalations on renal oxidative stress and some serum biochemical parameters in rats
Toxicology and Industrial Health, March 1, 2007; 23(2): 115 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. W. Martinez, N. S. Recht, T. H. Hostetter, and T. W. Meyer
Removal of P-Cresol Sulfate by Hemodialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 3430 - 3436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. F. Perna, D. Ingrosso, E. Satta, C. Lombardi, P. Galletti, A. D'Aniello, and N. G. De Santo
Plasma Protein Aspartyl Damage Is Increased in Hemodialysis Patients: Studies on Causes and Consequences
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2004; 15(10): 2747 - 2754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. W. Meyer, E. C. Leeper, D. W. Bartlett, T. A. Depner, Y. Z. Lit, C. R. Robertson, and T. H. Hostetter
Increasing Dialysate Flow and Dialyzer Mass Transfer Area Coefficient to Increase the Clearance of Protein-bound Solutes
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1927 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.