Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 14, Issue 90003 46-52, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press
A Liberati, E Telaro and A Perna
Though the concept of 'evidence-based medicine' (EBM) nowadays has become
very popular and even fashionable, its practice is far from being an
established reality. There are many reasons why, despite its potential, EBM
finds obstacles in expressing its full potential as a tool to better inform
health care decisions. Broadly speaking, these obstacles fall into three
categories: (i) inadequacy of available information with respect the
complexities of health care delivery; (ii) poor quality of clinical
research; and (iii) insufficient and inappropriate efforts to promote the
uptake of effective interventions in clinical practice. In the first part
of the paper, we will discuss: (i) what evidence-based medicine is: (ii)
why systematic reviews are the fundamental tool of EBM and what is really
special about them; (iii) what are the tools for the practice of EBM; (iv)
what its limitations are; and (v) what are the hindrances to its
implementation. In the second part, a brief assessment of the state of the
art of systematic reviews in nephrology will be presented, with special
reference to the activities of the recently launched Cochrane Collaborative
Review Group in Renal Diseases.
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Evidence-based medicine and its horizons: a useful tool for nephrologists?
Italian Cochrane Centre and Laboratory of Health Services Research, 'Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy; Centro di Ricerche Cliniche Aldo e Cele Daccò, 'Mario Negri' Institute, Villa Camozzi, Bergamo, Italy; Cattedra di Statistica Medica E Biometria, Universitá Degu Studi, Modena, Italy; Corresponding author at: Italian Cochrane Centre and Laboratory of Health Services Research, 'Mario Negri' Institute, via Eritrea 62, 2015 Milan, Italy
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?