Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Citing Articles
Right arrowScopus Links
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kloppenburg, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kloppenburg, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1999) 14: 2165-2172
© 1999 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Relating protein intake to nutritional status in haemodialysis patients: how to normalize the protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance (PNA)?

Wybe D. Kloppenburg, Coen A. Stegeman, Paul E. de Jong and Roel M. Huisman

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Groningen Institute for Drug Studies (GIDS)*, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands

Correspondence and offprint requests to: W. D. Kloppenburg, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

Background. The protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance (PNA) is assumed to be a reliable estimate of dietary protein intake in haemodialysis patients. Protein requirements are related to body size. In order to standardize PNA to individual differences in body size, PNA is normalized to various terms related to the patient's body weight. It is not clear which is the most appropriate method to normalize PNA.

Methods. We calculated five commonly used variants of normalized PNA and related them to indices of nutritional status in 57 stable chronic haemodialysis patients, 57±15 (mean±SD) years of age. PNA, determined by direct dialysate quantification, was normalized to actual post-dialysis dry body weight (DBW), normal body weight (DBWnormal), lean body mass (LBM), normal lean body mass (LBMnormal), and `normalized' body weight (N). Nutritional status was assessed using an index of nutrition composed of anthropometry derived parameters and plasma albumin concentration.

Results. PNADBW (0.85±0.14 g/kg/d) tended to be higher than PNADBWnormal (0.81±0.14 g/kg/d). PNALBM (1.17±0.19 g/kg/d) did not differ from PNALBMnormal (1.19±0.21 g/kg/d). PNAN (1.06± 0.14 g/kg/d) was significantly higher than PNADBW and PNADBWnormal, but lower than PNALBM and PNALBMnormal. Actual PNA (61±13 g/d) correlated significantly with DBW (r=0.52) and LBM (r=0.63) indicating that large patients eat more protein. Interestingly, actual PNA correlated with plasma albumin (r=0.33) and with the overall index of nutrition (r=0.27) as well. PNADBW correlated negatively with relative DBW (r=-0.32), expressed as a percentage of normal values, indicating that PNADBW is relatively high in underweight patients. In contrast, PNADBWnormal correlated positively with all nutritional parameters as well as with the overall index of nutrition (r=0.33). PNAN and PNALBM did not correlate with the nutritional status, but PNALBMnormal correlated positively with relative DBW (r=0.50) and with overall nutritional status (r=0.34). PNADBWnormal and PNALBMnormal in well-nourished patients showed overlap with the values in patients with evident malnutrition, despite the positive correlation of the normalized PNA values with nutritional status.

Conclusions. Normalizing PNA by DBWnormal and LBMnormal appeared to be the most appropriate method to standardize protein intake in haemodialysis patients. Since actual PNA is the purest estimate of protein intake that correlated with nutritional status, we recommend to evaluate actual PNA as well in studies that relate protein intake to patient outcome.

Keywords: dietary protein intake; haemodialysis; nutritional status; protein intake assessment; protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance; urea kinetic modeling

* GIDS is a part of the Groningen Utrecht Institute for Drug Exploration (GUIDE).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. S Shinaberger, S. Greenland, J. D Kopple, D. Van Wyck, R. Mehrotra, C. P Kovesdy, and K. Kalantar-Zadeh
Is controlling phosphorus by decreasing dietary protein intake beneficial or harmful in persons with chronic kidney disease?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2008; 88(6): 1511 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. M. Veeneman, H. A. Kingma, F. Stellaard, P. E. de Jong, D.-J. Reijngoud, and R. M. Huisman
Comparison of amino acid oxidation and urea metabolism in haemodialysis patients during fasting and meal intake
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1533 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. D. Kloppenburg, P. E. de Jong, and R. M. Huisman
The contradiction of stable body mass despite low reported dietary energy intake in chronic haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 1628 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. Kalantar-Zadeh, J. D. Kopple, G. Block, and M. H. Humphreys
Association Among SF36 Quality of Life Measures and Nutrition, Hospitalization, and Mortality in Hemodialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 2797 - 2806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.