Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andresdottir, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzels, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andresdottir, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzels, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 14, Issue 7 1723-1731, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Renal transplantation in patients with dense deposit disease: morphological characteristics of recurrent disease and clinical outcome

M Andresdottir, K Assmann, A Hoitsma, R Koene and J Wetzels
Division of Nephrology and Department of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Corresponding author

Background: Dense deposit disease (DDD) is an uncommon cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As a consequence, information on the outcome of renal transplantation in patients with DDD comes from a series with a limited number of patients. Methods: We present the histological and clinical data of 13 adult patients with DDD, who received their first allograft in our centre in the period between 1983 and 1994. Results: Renal transplant biopsies were performed in 11 patients, at 2.9 months after transplantation (median; range 0.1-13.8 months). The indication for taking the biopsy was in all instances a raised serum creatinine level. Five patients also had a significant proteinuria. In only one patient, light microscopy showed alterations in the capillary walls suggestive of a recurrence of DDD. However, by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy, we found glomerular deposits compatible with a recurrence of DDD in all 11 patients. Three patterns of glomerular C3 deposition were found: globular depositions only in the mesangium; mesangial accumulation with linear deposits in the capillary wall; and prominent linear presence in the capillary wall with only a few mesangial granules. The findings by electron microscopy matched the immunofluorescence results. The linear C3 accumulation in the capillary wall was visible ultrastructurally as electron-dense ribbon-like transformation of the glomerular basement membrane. Mesangial C3 deposits were seen ultrastructurally as local electron-dense deposits in the mesangium. Four patients showed a pronounced glomerular influx of neutrophils, accompanied by crescents in three patients. In these three latter patients, the recurrence of DDD was the only histological lesion. In the other patients, the recurrence was merely a coincidence, the biopsy demonstrating an additional histological lesion (three chronic vascular rejection, two acute rejection, one ischaemic necrosis and two cyclosporin A toxicity). Eight patients with a recurrence of DDD have progressed to ESRD at an average of 14 months (range 0.2-38 months) after transplantation. The recurrence was the sole cause of graft loss in the three patients with crescents. The patients in whom the C3 deposits were confined to the mesangium appeared to have a better prognosis. Conclusions: The histological recurrence rate of DDD is high. The histological picture is quite diverse, and in most patients abnormalities are only found by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. Up to one-quarter of the patients with DDD lost their grafts because of a recurrence. Key words: dense deposit disease; histology; outcome; recurrence; renal transplantation
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
W. A. Golgert, G. B. Appel, and S. Hariharan
Recurrent Glomerulonephritis after Renal Transplantation: An Unsolved Problem
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 800 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. J.H. Smith, J. Alexander, P. N. Barlow, M. Botto, T. L. Cassavant, H. T. Cook, S. R. de Cordoba, G. S. Hageman, T. S. Jokiranta, W. J. Kimberling, et al.
New Approaches to the Treatment of Dense Deposit Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 2447 - 2456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. E. Marin-Castano, G. E. Striker, O. Alcazar, P. Catanuto, D. G. Espinosa-Heidmann, and S. W. Cousins
Repetitive Nonlethal Oxidant Injury to Retinal Pigment Epithelium Decreased Extracellular Matrix Turnover In Vitro and Induced Sub-RPE Deposits In Vivo.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 4098 - 4112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. C. Pickering, J. Warren, K. L. Rose, F. Carlucci, Y. Wang, M. J. Walport, H. T. Cook, and M. Botto
Prevention of C5 activation ameliorates spontaneous and experimental glomerulonephritis in factor H-deficient mice
PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9649 - 9654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. E. Marin-Castano, K. G. Csaky, and S. W. Cousins
Nonlethal Oxidant Injury to Human Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cells Causes Cell Membrane Blebbing but Decreased MMP-2 Activity
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3331 - 3340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. C. Braun, D. M. Stablein, L. A. Hamiwka, L. Bell, S. M. Bartosh, and C. F. Strife
Recurrence of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type II in Renal Allografts: The North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study Experience
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2005; 16(7): 2225 - 2233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Floege
Recurrent glomerulonephritis following renal transplantation: an update
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1260 - 1265.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. M. Briganti, G. R. Russ, J. J. McNeil, R. C. Atkins, and S. J. Chadban
Risk of Renal Allograft Loss from Recurrent Glomerulonephritis
N. Engl. J. Med., July 11, 2002; 347(2): 103 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. Strunnikova, J. Baffi, A. Gonzalez, W. Silk, S. W. Cousins, and K. G. Csaky
Regulated Heat Shock Protein 27 Expression in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelium
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2001; 42(9): 2130 - 2138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. J. CHADBAN
Glomerulonephritis Recurrence in the Renal Graft
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2001; 12(2): 394 - 402.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.