Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 14, Issue 5 1146-1149, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press
C Erley, S Duda, D Rehfuss, B Scholtes, J Bock, C Muller, H Osswald and T Risler
Background. Radiographic contrast media (CM)
application causes a decline in renal function, especially in patients with
pre-existing renal dysfunction. In addition to hydration, several
vasodilating substances have been evaluated for their ability to prevent
renal damage after CM application. In a prospective, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study we investigated the effect of the oral
administration of theophylline, an adenosine receptor antagonist, on
changes in renal haemodynamics and tubular injury induced by CM in well
hydrated patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency.
Methods. We studied 80 patients with pre-existing
chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.5 mg/dl) who received
more than 100 ml iopromide. Hydration (either oral or intravenous) started
at least 24 h before and lasted until 24 h after CM application. In
addition, patients were randomly assigned to receive either theophylline
(810 mg daily) or placebo. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were
measured before and for 3 days after CM application. Urine was collected to
measure N-acetyl-{beta}-glucosaminidase (NAG)
enzymuria for the same period. Sixty-four patients completed the entire
study protocol (theophylline, n=35 and placebo,
n=29). Results. During the study
period serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance did not
change significantly in either group. Acute renal failure (increase of
serum creatinine of at least 0.5 mg/dl) could be observed in two patients
from the theophylline group (5.7%) and one from the placebo group (3.4%).
The increase in NAG excretion reached statistical significance
(P<0.05) in the placebo group on days 2 and 3
after CM application. Conclusions. Our results
indicate a role for adenosine in CM-induced tubulotoxicity. However, the
glomerular filtration rate is preserved by hydration alone in these
patients. The application of theophylline did not bring an additional
benefit. The use of adenosine antagonists may be beneficial in patients
where sufficient hydration may be impossible or in patients with a
concomitant decrease in renal blood flow (e.g. congestive heart failure).
Keywords: acute renal failure; adenosine; contrast
media; contrast-media toxicity; hydration; theophylline
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Prevention of radiocontrast-media-induced nephropathy in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency by hydration in combination with the adenosine antagonist theophylline
University of Tuebingen, Departments of Internal Medicine III, Diagnostic Radiology and Pharmacology, Eberhard-Karls-Universitat, Tubingen, Germany; Corresponding author
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Kelly, B. Dwamena, P. Cronin, S. J. Bernstein, and R. C. Carlos Meta-analysis: Effectiveness of Drugs for Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Ann Intern Med, February 19, 2008; 148(4): 284 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Venkataraman and J. A. Kellum Prevention of Acute Renal Failure Chest, January 1, 2007; 131(1): 300 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon, B. Muhlbauer, and H. Osswald Adenosine and kidney function. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 901 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pannu, N. Wiebe, M. Tonelli, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network Prophylaxis Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy JAMA, June 21, 2006; 295(23): 2765 - 2779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Huber, F. Eckel, M. Hennig, H. Rosenbrock, A. Wacker, D. Saur, A. Sennefelder, R. Hennico, C. Schenk, A. Meining, et al. Prophylaxis of Contrast Material-induced Nephropathy in Patients in Intensive Care: Acetylcysteine, Theophylline, or Both? A Randomized Study. Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 793 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Lee, M. Jan, S. C. Bae, J. D. Joo, F. R. Goubaeva, J. Yang, and M. Kim A1 adenosine receptor knockout mice are protected against acute radiocontrast nephropathy in vivo Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1367 - F1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Goldenberg and S. Matetzky Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 24, 2005; 172(11): 1461 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Bagshaw and W. A. Ghali Theophylline for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, May 23, 2005; 165(10): 1087 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yano, Y. Itoh, T. Kubota, T. Sendo, T. Koyama, T. Fujita, K. Saeki, A. Yuo, and R. Oishi A Prostacyclin Analog Prevents Radiocontrast Nephropathy via Phosphorylation of Cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Protein Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2005; 166(5): 1333 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Weisbord and P. M. Palevsky Radiocontrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 63 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Gleeson and S. Bulugahapitiya Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1673 - 1689. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maeder, M. Klein, T. Fehr, and H. Rickli Contrast nephropathy: Review focusing on prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1763 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Ix, C. E. McCulloch, and G. M. Chertow Theophylline for the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy: a meta-analysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2747 - 2753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Chertow, S.-L. T. Normand, and B. J. McNeil "Renalism": Inappropriately Low Rates of Coronary Angiography in Elderly Individuals with Renal Insufficiency J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 2462 - 2468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Cox and J. P. Tsikouris Preventing Contrast Nephropathy: What Is the Best Strategy? A Review of the Literature J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2004; 44(4): 327 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Hoffmann, M. Fischereder, B. Kruger, W. Drobnik, and B. K. Kramer The Value of N-Acetylcysteine in the Prevention of Radiocontrast Agent-Induced Nephropathy Seems Questionable J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 407 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Steinmetz, G. Gabriels, T. V. Le, H.-J. Piechota, K. H. Rahn, and E. Schlatter Vasoactivity of diadenosine polyphosphates in human small renal resistance arteries Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2496 - 2504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tello, W. Huber, W. Weiss, and K. Ilgmann Intrarenal Kinetics: Effect of Adenosine and Theophylline * Dr Huber and colleagues respond: Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 596 - 597. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kapoor, S. Kumar, S. Gulati, S. Gambhir, R. S. Sethi, and N. Sinha The role of theophylline in contrast-induced nephropathy: a case-control study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 1936 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Stamatakis Strategies for Treatment and Prevention of Acute Renal Failure Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2002; 15(5): 392 - 404. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. M. Esnault Radiocontrast media-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with renal failure: rationale for a new double-blind, prospective, randomized trial testing calcium channel antagonists Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1362 - 1364. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Huber, K. Ilgmann, M. Page, M. Hennig, U. Schweigart, B. Jeschke, L. Lutilsky, W. Weiss, H. Salmhofer, and M. Classen Effect of Theophylline on Contrast Material-induced Nephropathy in Patients with Chronic Renal Insufficiency: Controlled, Randomized, Double-blinded Study Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 772 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Kramer, J. Preuner, A. Ebenburger, M. Kaiser, U. Bergner, C. Eilles, M. C. Kammerl, G. A. J. Riegger, and D. E. Birnbaum Lack of renoprotective effect of theophylline during aortocoronary bypass surgery Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 910 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schindler, C. Stahl, S. Venz, K. Ludat, W. Krause, and U. Frei Removal of contrast media by different extracorporeal treatments Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1471 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. LAMEIRE and R. VANHOLDER Pathophysiologic Features and Prevention of Human and Experimental Acute Tubular Necrosis J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2001; 12(90001): S20 - S32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mosseri, M. Gare, and D. Rubinger Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2000; 36(1): 306 - 307. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. MURPHY, B. J. BARRETT, and P. S. PARFREY Contrast Nephropathy J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2000; 11(1): 177 - 182. [Full Text] |
||||















