Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (79)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moreso, F.
Right arrow Articles by Grinyo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moreso, F.
Right arrow Articles by Grinyo, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 14, Issue 4 930-935, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Donor age and delayed graft function as predictors of renal allograft survival in rejection-free patients

F Moreso, D Seron, S Gil-Vernet, L Riera, X Fulladosa, R Ramos, J Alsina and J Grinyo
Nephrology and Urology Departments, Ciutat Sanitàaria i Universitàia de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; Corresponding author

Background. Transplant recipients of kidneys harvested from old donors have a high incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and a poor graft outcome. This result is partly explained by the increased incidence of acute rejection in patients suffering from DGF. However, the long-term impact of donor age and DGF in rejection free renal transplants is not well established. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the impact of donor age and DGF on long-term outcome in renal transplant with or without acute rejection. Patients. We review all cadaveric kidney transplants performed in our centre between April 1984 and December 1995 treated with a cyclosporin-based immunosuppression. Results. Five hundred and ninety-five patients were included. The overall incidence of DGF was 29.1%, and this event was associated with an increased donor age and cold ischaemia time. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that graft loss was associated with acute rejection (relative risk (RR) 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-3.01); DGF (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.32-2.54); donors >50 years (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.38); and retransplantation (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.31). In rejection-free patients there were two independent predictors of graft failure: donor >50 years (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.45-4.01); and DGF (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.53-3.84). Conclusions. Regardless of the presence of acute rejection, delayed graft function amplifies the detrimental effect of advanced donor age on long-term graft outcome. Keywords: acute rejection; delayed function; donor age; long-term graft outcome; renal transplant
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Naesens, E. Lerut, H. de Jonge, B. Van Damme, Y. Vanrenterghem, and D. R. J. Kuypers
Donor Age and Renal P-Glycoprotein Expression Associate with Chronic Histological Damage in Renal Allografts
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 2468 - 2480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. W. Louvar, N. Li, J. Snyder, Y. Peng, B. L. Kasiske, and A. K. Israni
"Nature versus Nurture" Study of Deceased-Donor Pairs in Kidney Transplantation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2009; 20(6): 1351 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. G. Yarlagadda, S. G. Coca, R. N. Formica Jr, E. D. Poggio, and C. R. Parikh
Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2009; 24(3): 1039 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. G. Yarlagadda, S. G. Coca, A. X. Garg, M. Doshi, E. Poggio, R. J. Marcus, and C. R. Parikh
Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2995 - 3003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Moore, K. Tan, P. Cockwell, H. Krishnan, D. McPake, A. Ready, S. Mellor, A. Hamsho, S. Ball, G. Lipkin, et al.
Predicting early renal allograft function using clinical variables
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2669 - 2677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. De Perrot, T. K. Waddell, Y. Shargall, A. F. Pierre, E. Fadel, K. Uy, C. Chaparro, M. Hutcheon, L. G. Singer, and S. Keshavjee
Impact of donors aged 60 years or more on outcome after lung transplantation: Results of an 11-year single-center experience
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 525 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Remuzzi, P. Cravedi, A. Perna, B. D. Dimitrov, M. Turturro, G. Locatelli, P. Rigotti, N. Baldan, M. Beatini, U. Valente, et al.
Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors
N. Engl. J. Med., January 26, 2006; 354(4): 343 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. W. de Fijter and G. G. Persijn
Age, the riddle of renal transplantation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 2307 - 2310.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Lufft, G. Tusch, G. Offner, and R. Brunkhorst
Kidney transplantation in children: impact of young recipient age on graft survival
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2141 - 2146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Gourishankar, G. S. Jhangri, S. M. Cockfield, and P. F. Halloran
Donor Tissue Characteristics Influence Cadaver Kidney Transplant Function and Graft Survival but Not Rejection
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2003; 14(2): 493 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. L. Kasiske and J. Snyder
Matching Older Kidneys with Older Patients Does Not Improve Allograft Survival
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2002; 13(4): 1067 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. W. D. FIJTER, M. J. K. MALLAT, I. I. N. DOXIADIS, J. RINGERS, F. R. ROSENDAAL, F. H. J. CLAAS, and L. C. PAUL
Increased Immunogenicity and Cause of Graft Loss of Old Donor Kidneys
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2001; 12(7): 1538 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. M. Cruzado, J. Torras, M. Riera, I. Herrero, M. Hueso, L. Espinosa, E. Condom, N. Lloberas, J. Bover, J. Alsina, et al.
Influence of nephron mass in development of chronic renal failure after prolonged warm renal ischemia
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): F259 - F269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. M. Grinyo
Borderline kidney graft donors--what are the problems?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 950 - 952.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.