Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savage, D.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savage, D.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 14, Issue 4 891-894, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Risk of developing diabetic nephropathy is not associated with synergism between the angiotensin II (type 1) receptor C1166 allele and poor glycaemic control

D Savage, S Feeney, D Fogarty and A Maxwell
Nephrology Research Group, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK; Corresponding author address: Department of Medical Genetics, Floor A, Tower Block, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK; Present address: Section on Genetics and Epidemiology, Joslin Diabetes Centre, Boston, MA, USA

Background. It has recently been reported that the risk of developing nephropathy in patients with insulin dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus is strongly associated with synergism between poor glycaemic control and carriage of the hypertension associated angiotensin II (type 1) receptor C1166 allele. The same report also revealed an increase in risk of nephropathy in diabetic patients carrying a specific angiotensin II (type 1) receptor haplotype, i.e. C1166/140-bp microsatellite allele (major allele). Methods. In order to replicate these findings we performed PCR-based genotyping for the A1166%rarr;C DNA polymorphism and the CA repeat at the 3′ end of the angiotensin II (type 1) receptor gene employing validated groups of type 1 diabetic patients with (cases, n=95) and without (controls, n=97) nephropathy. HbA1 values above the median (10.5) were used as an index of poor glycaemic control. Results. The risk of nephropathy in carriers of the C1166 allele with HbA1 < 10.5 was 2.1 (95% CI 0.8-5.2) compared to 1.1 (95% CI 0.4-2.6) for non-carriers of the C1166 allele; however, these odds ratios were not significantly different. No difference in the frequency of the high-risk haplotype was found in cases compared to controls (12.4 vs 11.5; &khgr;2=0.01, P=0.938 with 1 df). Conclusions. The results of this study do not support previous findings that the risk of diabetic nephropathy is associated with synergism between poor glycaemic control and carriage of the C1166 allele or inheritance of the C1166/major microsatellite haplotype. Keywords: angiotensin II (type 1) receptor gene; diabetic nephropathy; DNA polymorphism; glycaemic control; insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus; renin-angiotensin system
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
K. G. Ewens, R. A. George, K. Sharma, F. N. Ziyadeh, and R. S. Spielman
Assessment of 115 Candidate Genes for Diabetic Nephropathy by Transmission/Disequilibrium Test
Diabetes, November 1, 2005; 54(11): 3305 - 3318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
B. Baudin
Polymorphism in angiotensin II receptor genes and hypertension
Exp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 90(3): 277 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.