Nephrol Dial Transplant (1999) 14: 2915-2921
© 1999 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association
What is hypertension in chronic haemodialysis? The role of interdialytic blood pressure monitoring
Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Sandip Mitra, Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, Herts SG1 4AB, UK.
Background. Hypertension in chronic haemodialysis patients contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. Treatment decisions are usually based on predialysis readings, which may not accurately reflect control during the interdialytic period.
Methods. We studied 40 randomly selected subjects on haemodialysis and compared readings by different methods at set times during the dialysis session with the 48-h interdialytic ambulatory readings. Conventional sphygmomanometer, automated Dinamap and Tm 2421(A&D) ambulatory monitor were used for BP measurements.
Results. Conventional sphygmomanometry and self measured automatic readings (Dinamap) were highly correlated (systolic r=0.93, P<0.001; diastolic r=0.90, P<0.001). Mean blood pressure on arrival ((PreC0) 158 mmHg systolic, 80 mmHg diastolic and 106 mmHg mean) significantly overestimated the mean ambulatory reading during the 6 h prior to attendance ((preAm6h) systolic 147 (P<0.01), diastolic 75 (P<0.01), mean 99 (P<0.01)). Fifteen patients (41%) demonstrated a marked difference (>20/10 mmHg) between the PreC0 and preAm6h (white-coat effect) persisting in seven patients (19%) after a period of rest 10 min predialysis (preC10) and present even in self-recorded Dinamap readings. There was a significant negative relationship between the systolic rise and the number of months on dialysis (P<0.05). Mean ambulatory BP on interdialytic day 2 was significantly greater than on day 1 whereas the awake—sleep differences were less on day 2 than day 1, both perhaps reflecting differences in volume status. The 20 min post-dialysis measurement (PoC20) for systolic, diastolic, and mean, unlike predialysis (PreC0 and preC10), onset (onC) and end of dialysis readings (enC) did not differ significantly from 48 h interdialytic means.
Conclusions. The best representation of interdialytic pressure was the 20-min post-dialysis reading. Walk-in predialysis pressures overestimate mean interdialytic pressures due to a high incidence of white-coat effect, which shows some habituation with time on dialysis. Ambulatory monitoring has a role in evaluating persistent poor blood pressure control in haemodialysis patients.
Keywords: ambulatory monitoring; blood pressure; best representative blood pressure; haemodialysis; measurement; white-coat effect
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Agarwal, T. Metiku, G. G. Tegegne, R. P. Light, Z. Bunaye, D. M. Bekele, and K. Kelley Diagnosing Hypertension by Intradialytic Blood Pressure Recordings Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1364 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. A. Lodi, C. Estridge, and C. Ghidini In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2950 - 2961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Agarwal, A. J. Peixoto, S. F.F. Santos, and C. Zoccali Pre- and Postdialysis Blood Pressures Are Imprecise Estimates of Interdialytic Ambulatory Blood Pressure Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2006; 1(3): 389 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|