Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saltissi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Healy, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saltissi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Healy, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1999) 14: 2698-2703
© 1999 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin sodium) and standard unfractionated heparin for haemodialysis anticoagulation

David Saltissi1, Colleen Morgan1, Justin Westhuyzen2 and Helen Healy1

1 Department of Renal Medicine and 2 Conjoint Renal Laboratory, Royal Brisbane and Keperra Hospitals, Brisbane, Australia

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr David Saltissi, Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston 4029, Queensland, Australia.

Background. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been suggested as providing safe, efficient, convenient and possibly more cost-effective anticoagulation for haemodialysis (HD) than unfractionated heparin, with fewer side-effects and possible benefits on uraemic dyslipidaemia.

Methods. In this prospective, randomized, cross-over study we compared the safety, clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of Clexane (enoxaparin sodium; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer) with unfractionated heparin in 36 chronic HD patients. They were randomly assigned to either Clexane (1 mg/kg body weight, equivalent to 100 IU) or standard heparin, and followed prospectively for 12 weeks (36 dialyses) before crossing over to the alternate therapy for a further 12 weeks. Heparin anticoagulation was monitored using activated coagulation times.

Results. Dialysis with Clexane resulted in less frequent minor fibrin/clot formation in the dialyser and lines than with heparin (P<0.001), but was accompanied by increased frequency of minor haemorrhage between dialyses (P<0.001). Clexane dose reduction (to a mean of 0.69 mg/kg) eliminated excess minor haemorrhage without increasing clotting frequencies. Mean vascular compression times were similar in both groups. Over 24 weeks, no changes in standard serum lipid profiles were observed.

Conclusions. This study suggests that a single-dose protocol of Clexane is an effective and very convenient alternative to sodium heparin, but currently direct costs are about 16% more. We recommend an initial dose of 0.70 mg/kg.

Keywords: anticoagulation; haemodialysis; heparin; lipids; low-molecular-weight heparins


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
B. Naumnik, K. Pawlak, and M. Mys'liwiec
Unfractionated Heparin but Not Enoxaparin Causes Delayed Plasma PAI-1 Depletion in Hemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Study
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, February 1, 2009; 15(1): 84 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Naumnik, J. Borawski, K. Pawlak, and M. Mysliwiec
Enoxaparin but not unfractionated heparin causes a dose-dependent increase in plasma TGF-{beta}1 during haemodialysis: a cross-over study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1690 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. Lim, D. J. Cook, and M. A. Crowther
Safety and Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Heparins for Hemodialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Failure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2004; 15(12): 3192 - 3206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Aggarwal, D. A. Whitaker, J. M. Rimmer, R. J. Solomon, F. J. Gennari, B. E. Sobel, and D. J. Schneider
Attenuation of platelet reactivity by enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1559 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Guillet, N. Simon, J. J. Sampol, A.-M. Lorec-Penet, H. Portugal, Y. Berland, B. Dussol, and P. Brunet
Pharmacokinetics of the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin during 48 h after bolus administration as an anticoagulant in haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2348 - 2353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Naumnik, J. Borawski, and M. Mysliwiec
Different effects of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin on extrinsic blood coagulation during haemodialysis: a prospective study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1376 - 1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. Taraktchoglou, A. A. Pacey, J. E. Turnbull, and A. Eley
Infectivity of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovar LGV but Not E Is Dependent on Host Cell Heparan Sulfate
Infect. Immun., February 1, 2001; 69(2): 968 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.