Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tobe, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tobe, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1999) 14: 2387-2391
© 1999 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Continuous veno–venous haemodialysis with a novel bicarbonate dialysis solution: prospective cross-over comparison with a lactate buffered solution

Deborah Zimmerman, Pat Cotman, Robert Ting, Stavros Karanicolas and Sheldon W. Tobe

Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence and offprint requests to: S. W. Tobe, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue A 240, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3MS, Canada.

Objective. To compare acid–base balance, lactate concentration and haemodynamic parameters during continuous veno–venous haemodialysis (CVVHD) using bicarbonate or a lactate buffered dialysate.

Methods. Design: prospective randomized cross-over design; Setting: Multicentre combined adult surgical and medical intensive care units. Patients; 26 critically ill patients starting CVVHD for acute renal failure. Interventions: Each patient to receive 48 h of bicarbonate dialysate and 48 h of lactate dialysate with the order of the 48 h block randomized at trial entry.

Results. The serum bicarbonate increased from baseline in both the lactate and bicarbonate groups over the first 48 h of treatment (16.3±1.53 to 22.2± 1.41 mmol/l and 18.9±2.02 to 22.2±1.18 mmol/l, respectively) and continued to rise towards normal over the next 48 h after cross-over to the other dialysate. The H+ and pCO2 only trended higher in the lactate group. Unlike the acid–base parameters, serum lactate levels varied depending on the dialysate composition. The patients initially randomized to the lactate dialysate had higher serum lactate levels and these tended to increase further after 48 h of dialysis from 2.4±0.8 to 2.6±0.4 mmol/l. However, in the following 48 h the lactate levels fell to 1.8±0.6 (P=0.039) while patients were being treated with the bicarbonate dialysate. Similar results were seen in the patients initially randomized to the bicarbonate dialysate. Serum lactate remained stable over the first 48 h (1.4±0.2 to 1.5±0.1 mmol/l) but after cross-over to the lactate dialysate increased to 3.1±0.7 mmol/l (P=0.051). Overall, lactate levels were significantly higher during dialysis with lactate buffered solution than bicarbonate buffered solution (2.92±0.45 vs 1.61±0.25 mmol/l P=0.01). Mean arterial pressure trended higher during bicarbonate dialysis but did not reach statistical significance (lactate vs bicarbonate; 71.1±3.1 vs 81.3±5.8 mmHg). Subgroup analysis of the patients with abnormal liver indices or increased lactate levels at initiation of dialysis (n=15) revealed only a trend toward better bicarbonate control (lactate vs bicarbonate; 22.00±1.73 vs 22.86±1.09, P=0.2). However, in this group with hepatic insufficiency elevations in serum lactate were even greater during lactate compared to the bicarbonate dialysis (3.39±0.68 vs 1.78±0.42 P=0.036). Patients who had elevations of lactate during lactate dialysis had a high mortality (6 of 7). These patients had an even greater disparity in lactate levels (4.3±1.4 vs 1.3±0.3) and blood pressure (68.0±7.7 vs 87.2±17.1) between lactate and bicarbonate dialysis. Due to small patient numbers these comparisons did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusion. During continuous veno–venous haemodialysis a bicarbonate buffered dialysis solution provided equal acid–base control but maintained more normal lactate levels than a lactate buffered dialysis solution.

Keywords: acid base control; acute renal failure; bicarbonate solutions; continuous renal replacement therapy; haemodialysis; lactic acidosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. M. Ho
Hyperlactataemia induced by CVVHDF with low lactate bicarbonate-buffered solutions in patients with liver dysfunction
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1096 - 1099.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.