Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sivanesan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bakran, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sivanesan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bakran, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 14, Issue 1 118-120, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Sites of stenosis in AV fistulae for haemodialysis access

S Sivanesan, T How and A Bakran
Renal Transplant Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK; Corresponding author

Background: A large proportion of late failures of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae are related to the progression of intimal hyperplasia. The aetiology of this process is still unknown but the fistula configuration and resultant haemodynamics have been implicated. This clinical study was devised to identify sites of stenosis in patients with fistulae and relate the findings to various clinical and geometrical parameters. Methods: Measurement of anastomotic length and angle was made intraoperatively in 25 consecutive fistulae. Post-operative assessment was carried out at regular intervals using duplex and colour-flow ultrasonography. Results: Stenoses were present in all 25 of the fistulae studied at 3 months. The stenoses could be classified to three specific sites: at the anastomosis (Type 1), on the inner wall of the curved region of the cephalic vein (Type 2) and just proximal to this curved segment where the vein straightens out (Type 3). Most of Type 1 and Type 2 stenoses were not progressive while type 3 stenoses were generally progressive. Conclusions: These finding emphasize the need for an effective surveillance programme of AV fistulae. Key words: arteriovenous fistula; anastomosis geometry; duplex ultrasound
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Tuka, M. Slavikova, Z. Krupickova, M. Mokrejsova, E. Chytilova, and J. Malik
Short-term outcomes of borderline stenoses in vascular accesses with PTFE grafts
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 25, 2009; (2009) gfp195v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Heye, G. Maleux, K. Claes, D. Kuypers, and R. Oyen
Stenosis Detection in Native Hemodialysis Fistulas with MDCT Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Singh, M. L. Robbin, M. E. Lockhart, and M. Allon
Clinically Immature Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Fistulas: Effect of US on Salvage
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 299 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. L. Froger, L. E. M. Duijm, Y. S. Liem, A. V. Tielbeek, A. B. Donkers-van Rossum, P. Douwes-Draaijer, P. W. M. Cuypers, J. Buth, and H. C. M. van den Bosch
Stenosis Detection with MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access Fistulas and Grafts
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 284 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. K. Rajan, S. Bunston, S. Misra, R. Pinto, and C. E. Lok
Dysfunctional Autogenous Hemodialysis Fistulas: Outcomes after Angioplasty--Are There Clinical Predictors of Patency?
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 508 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.