Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olaizola, I.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzuchi, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olaizola, I.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzuchi, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 90003 15-18, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Are there any differences in the parathyroid response in the different types of renal osteodystrophy?

I Olaizola, A Aznarez, V Jorgetti, A Petraglia, H Caorsi, G Zcuna, L Fajardo, P Ambrosoni and N Mazzuchi
Nephrology Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital de Clinicas, Montevideo, Uruguay; Hospital das Clinicas, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Corresponding author address: Centro de Nefrologia 'Renis', Mario Cassinoni 1681, CP 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay

With the purpose of studying the curve of parathyroid response to variations of serum calcium during dialysis, we studied 20 patients on haemodialysis: 10 women and 10 men, with different forms of bone disease diagnosed by bone biopsy (adynamic bone disease, mild hyperparathyroidism, severe hyperparathyroidism). In all patients, we performed parathyroid stimulation by 4 h dialysis with 1 mEq/l of Ca2+ in the dialysate, and an inhibition test in another dialysis session with 4 mEq/l of Ca2+, with a 48 h interval. Ca2+ and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) were measured prior to dialysis and every hour subsequently, to obtain a Ca2+-iPTH for each patient. The analysis of the curves was made using Brown's four-parameter model. Stimulation and inhibition levels were similar in all groups, but basal iPTH and the response profiles obtained varied in the different histological groups. Basal, maximal and minimal iPTH were lower in adynamic forms than in the other two groups (P<0.04), and basal calcium was higher than basal calcium of severe hyperparathyroidism, expressing a basal inhibition status. In severe hyperparathyroidism, basal calcium was lower than the set-point, showing a permanent stimulation, and the slope was higher than in other groups, showing more sensitivity to serum calcium variations. The set-point of severe hyperparathyroidism was significantly higher than the set-point of mild and adynamic forms. In conclusion, the functional parathyroid study showed a different response in the different forms of renal osteodystrophy.Keywords: adynamic bone disorder disease; calcium; haemodialysis; hyperparathyroidism; iPTH
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.