Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Midtvedt, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brekke, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Midtvedt, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brekke, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 7 1637-1641, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


DIALYSIS AND TRANSPLANTATION NEWS

Routine perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in renal transplantation

K Midtvedt, A Hartman, T Midtvedt and I Brekke
Departments of Internal Medicine and Surgery, The National Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway; Laboratory of Medical Microbial Ecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Corresponding author at: Medical Department B III, Rikshospitalet, N-0027 Oslo, Norway

Background: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis may prevent infection following renal transplantation but it also contributes to development of resistant microorganisms. With refined surgical techniques, improved graft preservation, and immunosuppressive monitoring during recent decades one can question the present use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of infection in our renal transplant centre where antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely used in renal recipients. Concurrently we performed a survey of perioperative antibiotic use to establish the current world-wide practice. Methods: Infection episodes were evaluated from records of 448 adult renal transplant recipients (January 1994 to August 1996) at our centre. A questionnaire was mailed to 103 centres addressing the number of kidney transplantations in 1995, donor source (living vs cadaveric) and details on use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Results: Single-centre study. Renal transplantation was performed without antibiotic prophylaxis in 377 patients (84%). Thirteen patients (3.4%) had early postoperative infections, nine with urinary-tract infection tended to have urinary catheter for a longer period than those without infection (5.0±2.7 vs 3.4±1.4 days, P-0.27) and cadaveric kidney recipients to have higher incidence of infections (4.5 vs 1.5% P=0.14). All infection episodes were successfully treated. The infection incidence in 71 (16%) 'high-risk' patients selected for antibiotic treatment was 4.2%. World-wide survey. Data were obtained from 101 centres in five continents representing 10 532 renal transplants. Ninety centres (89%) used perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Conclusion: The infection incidence in patients who did not receive perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was the same as in a small group of selected patients who received prophylaxis. The incidence was lower than usually reported in the literature. In contrast perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is given to all patients in almost 90% of transplant centres world-wide. A reduction of prophylactic antibiotic use is encouraged. Key words: early post-transplant infection incidence; perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis; world wide survey
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A S. Mathis, N. Dave, N. K Shah, and G. S Friedman
Bleeding and Thrombosis in High-Risk Renal Transplantation Candidates Using Heparin
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2004; 38(4): 537 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.