Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moe, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peacock, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moe, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peacock, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 5 1234-1241, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Safety and efficacy of pulse and daily calcitriol in patients on CAPD: a randomized trial

S Moe, M Kraus, C Gassensmith, N Fineberg, F Gannon and M Peacock
Indiana University Department of medicine, Wishard Memorial Hospital, POW 526, 1001 W 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 462002, USA; Richard L Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA; University Pennsylvania Department of Pathology, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corresponding author at Wishard Memorial Hospital

Background: Calcitriol therapy is the mainstay of therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Oral administration of calcitriol is necessary in CAPD patients, but no studies have directly compared different routes of administration in this patient population. Methods: To determine if the peak serum calcitriol level (pulse therapy) is more important than the total delivered dose, we randomized CAPD patients with mild to moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism to receive either pulse (3.0 &mgr;g twice a week, n=10) or daily (0.75 &mgr;g a day, n=8) oral calcitriol in comparable weekly doses. The main comparison was the rate of decline of serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels to reach the desired end-point of 100 pg/ml. The patients were dialysed with low-calcium dialysate and received only calcium-containing phosphate binders. Results: Pharmacokinetic analysis after a single dose of 3.0 &mgr;g (pulse) vs 0.75 &mgr;g (daily) revealed 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D levels to be higher in the pulse group at 3 and 6 h, but equivalent by 12 h. The area under the curve for 1 week of daily and 1 week of pulse therapy was equal. The patients in the 2 arms had equivalent basal serum levels of PTH (pulse=562±291 vs daily=454±113 pg/ml), calcium (pulse=2.32±0.20 vs daily=2.32±0.12 mmol/l) and phosphorus (pulse=1.32±0.52 vs daily=1.35±0.26 mmol/l). The time required for the PTH to decrease to 100 pg/ml and rate of decline in PTH were similar (time: pulse=14.2±6.8 weeks, daily=12.2±7 weeks; rate: pulse=7.4±4.2 vs daily=8.4±4.2% PTH/week; P=NS). The serum calcium increased similarly in both groups. Hypercalcaemia (>2.9 mmol/l) was rare (pulse=3, daily=2 episodes). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that pulse and daily calcitriol are similarly effective and safe for the treatment of mild to moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism in CAPD patients despite higher peak levels of 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D with pulse therapy. Key words: calcitriol; calcium balance; CAPD; dialysis; hyperparathyroidism; renal osteodystrophy
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. C. Palmer, D. O. McGregor, P. Macaskill, J. C. Craig, G. J. Elder, and G. F.M. Strippoli
Meta-analysis: Vitamin D Compounds in Chronic Kidney Disease
Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 840 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. J. Schroeder and J. Cunningham
What's new in vitamin D for the nephrologist?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 460 - 466.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.