Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Citing Articles
Right arrowScopus Links
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korzets, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gafter, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korzets, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gafter, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 5 1215-1220, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The femoral artery-femoral vein polytetrafluorethylene graft: a 14-year retrospective study

A Korzets, Y Ori, S Baytner, D Zein, A Chagnac, T Weinstein, M Harman, M Agmon and U Gafter
The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Nephrology and Vascular Surgery Unit, Rabin Medical Center-Golda Campus, 7 Keren Kayemet St, Petah Tikva 49372, Israel; Corresponding author

Background: The use of the femoral vessels for permanent haemodialysis access has been neglected during the last two decades. Since 1981 femoral artery-vein loop polytetrafluoroethylene grafts have been constructed in our chronic haemodialysis patients. This study examines results obtained in patients with this particular graft over the last 14 years. Methods: This clinical study is retrospective in nature. Overall 35 patients, with 37 femoral grafts, are included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for this type of graft are given and the surgical procedure detailed. Results: Seven patients had femoral grafts used as primary dialysis access. Twenty-eight patients had femoral grafts used after multiple access failures. There was no perioperative mortality. Immediate thrombotic non-function of the graft occurred in three patients. In the long term no patient death was related to the femoral grafts. Twenty-seven (73%) grafts had no long-term complications. The leading cause for graft 'loss' was patient death; in the first year 10 grafts were lost, eight because of patient death. All eight patients died with functioning grafts. Median graft survival was 21 months in all patients and 28 months in non-diabetic patients. Twenty-seven (73%) grafts were patent at the end of the first year, 33% of grafts were still patent after 5 years. Worsening claudication occurred in four patients; one diabetic required foot amputation. Four patients had late graft thrombosis; only two patients had bacteraemia originating from the femoral graft. Urea reduction ratio greater than 60% was measured in 87.5% of patients. Conclusion: The femoral artery-vein graft is a good primary and secondary haemodialysis access. Both infection and thrombosis rates are low and graft survival is comparable, if not superior to, that of upper-limb grafts. The graft is easy to cannulate, can be used early, is easily protected, and is cosmetically acceptable.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. M. Peirce, B. Funaki, T. G. Van Ha, and J. M. Lorenz
Percutaneous Declotting of Virgin Femoral Hemodialysis Grafts
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1615 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.