Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 5 1176-1182, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
E Brandstrom, A Grzegorczyk, L Jacobsson, P Friberg, A Lindahl and M Aurell
Background: The aim of the present study was to
compare the most commonly used GFR markers for clearance measurements,
51Cr-EDTA and iohexol, using two different methods
for iohexol analysis, HPLC and X-ray fluorescence, referring both to the
multiple-sample and single-sample calculations, using
51Cr-EDTA as the reference method.
Methods: Forty-nine patients with an estimated GFR
>40 ml/min were included. 51Cr-EDTA and
iohexol were injected simultaneously and blood samples were taken 150, 195
and 240 min after injection of the respective marker.
Results: The multiple-point clearances, determined
from HPLC and X-ray fluorescence, compared to
51Cr-EDTA correlated highly (r=0.92 and 0.95
respectively). The results from single-point clearance comparison, iohexol
measured by HPLC vs 51Cr-EDTA
yielded a correlation of r=0.91 and an intercept statistically different
from origo. Conclusions: Iohexol
and 51Cr-EDTA are comparable as GFR markers for
multiple-point clearance measurements. The single-sample method for GFR
>40 ml/min can be used with a high accuracy. The precision and
accuracy of X-ray fluorescence analysis of low concentrations of iohexol
were less than those of HPLC. Care should therefore be taken when using
X-ray fluorescence that the injected dose of iohexol should result in a
plasma concentration level of iodine of at least 0.06 mg/ml at the time of
blood sampling. Key words: Cr-EDTA clearance; iohexol;
glomerular filtration rate
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
GFR measurement with iohexol and 51Cr-EDTA. A comparison of the two favoured GFR markers in Europe
Departments of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Chemistry, Radiation Physics and Nephrology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Goteborg, Sweden; Corresponding author
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Delanaye, C. Mariat, E. Cavalier, and J.-M. Krzesinski Errors induced by indexing glomerular filtration rate for body surface area: reductio ad absurdum Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3593 - 3596. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A M. Peters, N. J Bird, I. Halsall, C. Peters, and A R. Michell Evaluation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (eGFR) against simultaneous, dual-marker multi-sample measurements of glomerular filtration rate Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. J. Bird, C. Peters, A. R. Michell, and A. M. Peters Effect of extracellular fluid volume on single-sample measurement of glomerular filtration rate Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 104 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Delanaye, E. Cavalier, M. Froissart, and J. M. Krzesinski Reproducibility of GFR measured by chromium-51-EDTA and iohexol Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 4077 - 4078. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. J Bird, C. Peters, A R. Michell, and A M. Peters Reproducibilities and responses to food intake of GFR measured with chromium-51-EDTA and iohexol simultaneously and independently in normal subjects Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1902 - 1909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Tidman, P. Sjostrom, and I. Jones A Comparison of GFR estimating formulae based upon s-cystatin C and s-creatinine and a combination of the two Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 154 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. C. Dagher, S. Herget-Rosenthal, S. G. Ruehm, S.-K. Jo, R. A. Star, R. Agarwal, and B. A. Molitoris Newly Developed Techniques to Study and Diagnose Acute Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 2188 - 2198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Bostom, F. Kronenberg, and E. Ritz Predictive Performance of Renal Function Equations for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Normal Serum Creatinine Levels J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2002; 13(8): 2140 - 2144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|