Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thibaudin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Berthoux, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thibaudin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Berthoux, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 3 711-715, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Advantage of antithymocyte globulin induction in sensitized kidney recipients: a randomized prospective study comparing induction with and without antithymocyte globulin

D Thibaudin, E Alamartine, J de Filippis, N Diab, B Laurent and F Berthoux
Service de Nephrologie Dialyse Transplantation Renale, Hopital Nord, F-42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France; Corresponding author

Background: Sensitized kidney allograft recipients require special management to improve their outcome. One strategy is heavy immunosuppression with antilymphocyte antibodies. Controversy continues about the actual advantage of induction protocols whilst infections and cancers are a constant risk. In addition, little is known about how to handle sensitized patients with low levels of sensitization. Methods: In this study we randomized sensitized renal transplant recipients, who received prophylactic treatment with or without antithymocyte globulin (ATG), in addition to a standard triple regimen consisting of cyclosporin, steroids and azathioprine at ATG discontinuation. The induction treatment consisted of a low-dose ATG course over 10 days. Randomization was stratified on the maximum PRA, according to the five following classes: 5%<PRA⩽20%, 20%<PRA⩽40%, 40%<PRA⩽60%, 60%<PRA;⩽80% and 80%<PRA⩽100%. Results: Eighty nine patients were enrolled: 47 patients received ATG and 42 did not. ATG induction lowered the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes from 64 to 38%, increased 1 year graft survival from 76 to 89% and was associated with a higher 1 year inulin clearance (37±15 vs 49±18 ml/min). ATG-associated side effects were restricted to leucopenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas bacterial and viral infections, gammopathies and cancers did not occur more frequently. ATG induction benefited all sensitized patients, and not only the hypersensitized patients. Conclusions: We conclude that ATG induction is beneficial for all sensitized patients, regardless of their level of sensitization, with regard to acute rejection episodes, graft survival and graft function. Low-dose ATG is sufficient and prevents additional complications. Key words: antithymocyte globulin; immunosuppression; induction therapy; renal transplantation; triple therapy
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Haas, G. A. Bohmig, Z. Leko-Mohr, M. Exner, H. Regele, K. Derfler, W. H. Horl, and W. Druml
Peri-operative immunoadsorption in sensitized renal transplant recipients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1503 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. Polsky, K. P. Weinfurt, B. Kaplan, J. Kim, J. Fastenau, and K. A. Schulman
An economic and quality-of-life assessment of basiliximab vs antithymocyte globulin immunoprophylaxis in renal transplantation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 1028 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.