Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonetti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Berland, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leonetti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Berland, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 3 617-622, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Dietary and urinary risk factors for stones in idiopathic calcium stone formers compared with healthy subjects

F Leonetti, B Dussol, P Berthezene, X Thirion and Y Berland
Service de Nephrologie, Hospital Sainte Marguerite, 270, Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, F-13009 Marseille, France; Unite de Recherche de Physiologie et Pathologie digestives-INSERM Unite 315, Marseille, France; Departement d'Informatique Medicale, France; Corresponding author

Background: The high social-economic cost of nephrolithiasis wholly justifies the attempts to understand its mechanism and avoid recurrences. The influence of dietary habits and urinary risk factors has been evaluated, but the results were discrepant, probably because of differences in the methodologies used to compare patients and controls. Methods: The aim was to assess dietary and urinary risk factors for urinary stones by comparison between 108 calcium stone formers (SF) and 210 healthy subjects(HS). All subjects were recruited during the same 1 year period. Personal characteristics, dietary habits (evaluated through a food frequency questionnaire) and urinary biochemical parameters were collected. The high predominance of men in the SF group led us to focus on the 79 SF and the 96 HS men. Results: A familial history of stones was reported more frequently in SF than in HS, 42.9% vs 17.6%, P<0.005. Body weight was higher in SF, 76.8±12.2 kg vs 72.8±9.6 kg, P=0.02; and calcium intake was lower in SF, 794.8±294.1 mg vs 943.6±345.4 mg, P<0.01. For urinary parameters, calcium and oxalate output were significantly higher in SF. Urinary urea, as a reflection of daily protein intake, and uric acid were also higher in SF. Urinary citrate excretion related to body weight was lower in SF. Calciuria was significantly correlated with urinary urea in both SF, and HS, but the correlation was stronger for SF. Calciuria correlated significantly with natriuria only in HS. Conclusions: The main differences between SF and HS were that SF had a family history of stones, a higher body weight, a lower daily intake of calcium, and a higher urinary output of calcium and oxalate. These results underlie the combined role of genetic and nutritional factors in the pathogenesis of urinary stone formation. Key words: calcium intake; calcium stone formers; dietary habits; hypercalciuria; hypocitraturia; hyperoxaluria
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
C P Williams, D F Child, P R Hudson, G K Davies, M G Davies, R John, P S Anandaram, and A R De Bolla
Why oral calcium supplements may reduce renal stone disease: report of a clinical pilot study
J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2001; 54(1): 54 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.