Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sivanesan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bakran, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sivanesan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bakran, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 12 3108-3110, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Characterizing flow distributions in AV fistulae for haemodialysis access

S Sivanesan, T How and A Bakran
Department of Clinical Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Renal Transplant Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescott Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK; Corresponding author

Background. The arteriovenous fistula is the most widely used means of enabling vascular access for chronic haemodialysis. When interest in vascular access was at its height, in the 1970s, a substantial amount of work was carried out on the physiology of arteriovenous fistulae and on the relationship between fistula flow and patency. One omission in the catalogue of studies was research into the distribution of flow in the fistula and the effects on surgical outcome. Method. To address this issue, 30 patients with end-to-side radiocephalic fistulae were studied. Flow measurements were made intraoperatively, and at various intervals postoperatively using colour-flow ultrasonography. Results. In 22 cases, the development of the fistula was monitored at regular intervals for periods of up to 27 months. In seven of the 30 fistulae, flow in the distal artery was antegrade, while in the remaining 23, distal artery flow was retrograde. The proportion of fistula flow supplied by the proximal and distal arteries varied considerably. Conclusion. Despite the wide range of flow distributions in the fistulae studied, flow distribution did not appear to affect fistula maturation or long-term function. Keywords: arteriovenous fistula; blood flow; duplex ultrasound; flow distribution; haemodynamics
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. F. Kheda, L. E. Brenner, M. J. Patel, J. J. Wynn, J. J. White, L. M. Prisant, S. A. Jones, and W. D. Paulson
Influence of arterial elasticity and vessel dilatation on arteriovenous fistula maturation: a prospective cohort study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 15, 2009; (2009) gfp462v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
N. Knops and E. Beek
Salvage of a radiocephalic fistula by the palmar arch
NDT Plus, October 1, 2008; 1(5): 326 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Mickley
Steal syndrome strategies to preserve vascular access and extremity
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 19 - 24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Mickley
Surgical alternatives to central venous catheters in chronic renal replacement therapy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1045 - 1051.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. Konner, B. Nonnast-Daniel, and E. Ritz
The Arteriovenous Fistula
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2003; 14(6): 1669 - 1680.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Konner
The anastomosis of the arteriovenous fistula--common errors and their avoidance
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 376 - 379.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.