Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Solez, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Solez, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 1 165-172, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

On the influence of sample size on the prognostic accuracy and reproducibility of renal transplant biopsy

H Wang, C Kjellstrand, S Cockfield and K Solez
Department of Pathology and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada; Corresponding author at: VP Medical Affairs Aksys Ltd, Two Marriott Drive, Lincolnshire, IL 60069, USA

Introduction: The minimal specimen size necessary for accurate interpretation of renal biopsy has not been identified. We attempted such a determination by three different analyses of a collection of biopsies performed in renal transplants. Methods: First, we studied the influence of three lesions (glomerulosclerosis, arteriolar hyalinosis, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy) in 199 baseline biopsies, obtained at time of transplantation, on transplant outcome. Secondly, we compared the results from the three lesions, in baseline biopsy with those from 114 subsequent core biopsies in the same patients. Thirdly, we compared the two baseline biopsies obtained in 118 paired kidneys in cadaver transplantation where both kidneys were used. Results: For statistically significant prediction of outcome from glomerulosclerosis, we found that a specimen containing at least 25 glomeruli was needed in the baseline biopsy. Arteriolar hyalinosis predicted outcome independent of sample size, but became less important than percentage glomerulosclerosis in predicting outcome if only samples containing more than 25 glomeruli were considered. Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy did not predict the outcome for a kidney, independent of sample size. When comparing baseline with subsequent core biopsies, or with paired baseline biopsies, at least 14 glomeruli were necessary to allow even moderate reproducibility of glomerulosclerosis (Cohen's kappa <0.25) and to allow statistical significance (P <0.05). The reproducibility of arteriolar hyalinosis was not dependent on sample size but was reproducible in 80% of paired baseline biopsies, and in 67% of the comparison of the baseline with core biopsy. Both precision and significance was lost if sample numbers were reduced by including only larger samples. There was no reproducibility I any study of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy when comparing either baseline with subsequent biopsy, or paired baseline biopsies. Summary: Much larger biopsy samples are necessary than has generally been assumed in order for glomerulosclerosis rates to be reproducible or predictive of outcome. Arteriolar hylainosis is prognostically important and shows good reproducibility independent of sample size. Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy appear useless as predictors, being of no prognostic importance and lacking reproducibility. Our finding clarifies some of the discrepancies found by different investigators regarding the importance of renal biopsy in predicting prognosis. Preliminary, our data indicate that samples containing fewer than 25 glomeruli are unreliable in determining outcome based on glomerulosclerosis. The importance of our findings which are based only on chronic lesions, with respect to acute changes, is unknown. Key words: sample size; renal biopsy; prognosis; transplant outcome; reproducibility
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. R. Raspollini, L. Messerini, G. L. Taddei, M. Panesar, J. Kumar, S. Abul-Ezz, M. Haas, H. Rabb, E. S. Kraus, L. B. Hilbrands, et al.
Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors.
N. Engl. J. Med., May 11, 2006; 354(19): 2071 - 2074.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. R. Ellingsen, J. R. Nyengaard, R. Osterby, K. A. Jorgensen, S. E. Petersen, and N. Marcussen
Measurements of cortical interstitium in biopsies from human kidney grafts: how representative and how reproducible?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 788 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. Pokorna, S. Vitko, M. Chadimova, and O. Schuck
Adverse effect of donor arteriolosclerosis on graft outcome after renal transplantation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 705 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Sund, A. V. Reisater, P. Fauchald, O. Bentdal, K. S. Hall, and T. Hovig
Living donor kidney transplants: a biopsy study 1 year after transplantation, compared with baseline changes and correlation to kidney function at 1 and 3 years
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2445 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.