Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paulson, W.
Right arrow Articles by Work, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paulson, W.
Right arrow Articles by Work, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 1 118-124, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Accuracy and reproducibility of urea recirculation in detecting haemodialysis access stenosis

W Paulson, M Gadallah, B Bieber, S Altman, C Birk and J Work
Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center, PO Boc 33932, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA; Open Access Sonography, Inc., Boc Raton, FL, USA; Corresponding author

Background: There is wide disagreement among studies that have evaluated the accuracy of urea recirculation (UR) in detecting vascular access stenosis. The 3-site method (UR3) has been discredited and replaced by the 2-site method (UR2), but few studies have evaluated UR2. Methods: We compared the accuracies of UR2 and UR3 in detecting stenosis in 59 haemodialysis patients during a 12-month period. All patients were studied without regard to clinical suspicion of stenosis. Stenosis (⩾50% luminal narrowing) was diagnosed by duplex ultrasound and confirmed by angiography. The reproducibility of UR2 was determined by computing its total standard deviation (SDTOT) from measurements during three dialysis sessions over a 15-day period. Results: Stenosis was found in 32% of 124 access studies (mean luminal narrowing=58%, range=50-83%). The mean UR values of stenotic accesses were only slightly higher than nonstenotic accesses for both UR2 (7.6% vs 2.9%, P <0.01) and UR3 (13.1% vs 11.2%, P=0.22). An increase in blood pump speed from 300 to 425 ml/min did not improve detection of stenosis by UR2. There were no UR thresholds that cold adequately separate the presence of stenosis from its absence. The SDTOT of UR2 was 3.8%, indicating that a patient's UR2 measurement may vary over a range of 16% (±2SDTOT=±8%). Conclusion: Stenosis of the haemodialysis access does not predictably cause recirculation, and the reproducibility of the UR2 measurement is poor. Key words: blood urea nitrogen; blood-vessel prosthesis; dialysis; recirculation; ultrasonography; vascular patency
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Canaud, H. Leray-Moragues, N. Kerkeni, J.-Y. Bosc, and K. Martin
Effective flow performances and dialysis doses delivered with permanent catheters: a 24-month comparative study of permanent catheters versus arterio-venous vascular accesses
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1286 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.