Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binet, I.
Right arrow Articles by Thiel, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binet, I.
Right arrow Articles by Thiel, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 9 1940-1948, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Outcome in emotionally related living kidney donor transplantation

I Binet, A Bock, P Vogelbach, T Gasser, A Kiss, F Brunner and G Thiel
Divisions of Nephrology and Psychosomatic, Department of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Division of Urology, Kantonsspital Basel, Switzerland; Corresponding author at: Abteilung fur Nephrologie, Kantonsspital Basel, Petergraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Schweiz

Background. The growing shortage of cadaver kidneys, the limited possibilities to expand the living related donor pool and the good results obtained in our centre with poorly matched cadaver kidneys, led us in 1991 to begin accepting highly motivated, unrelated, living kidney donors who had a strong emotional bond with the recipients. Methods. Between 1 January 1991 and 1 January 1996, 46 potential living kidney donors and their emotionally related recipients were evaluated. Twenty-three cases were accepted for renal transplantation after thorough somatic and psychological evaluation. The mean post-transplant follow-up until 1 April 1996 was of 28±3 months. Compatible blood groups and a negative cross-match were mandatory, but no minimal HLA matching was required. Results. There was a 50% drop-out rate following the initial screening. The main reasons for not performing transplantation were immunological contraindications in 39% of the cases, somatic in 30.5%, psychological in 26% and socioeconomic in 4.5%. In the accepted group of recipients, 48% (11/23) received transplants without chronic dialysis. Donor survival was 91%; two deaths unrelated to nephrectomy occurred 1 year after donation. The 2-year actuarial recipient and graft survivals were 100% and 91% respectively, compared to 99% (recipients) and 93% (grafts) in the non-HLA-identical living related kidney transplant group, and to 93% (recipients) and 83% (grafts) in the cadaver kidney transplant group. Recipient rehabilitation was completed after 4±1 months. Emotionally related donors returned to work 5±2 weeks after nephrectomy, and no donor regretted his decision, even in the case of failure. Conclusions. Kidney transplantation from emotionally related living donors represents a valuable option, allowing more patients with end-stage renal disease to avoid chronic dialysis. Recipient and graft outcome were superior to cadaver kidney transplantation. Motivated and emotionally related donors should be allowed to donate one of their kidneys provided that they are carefully selected and thoroughly informed. Keywords: kidney transplantation; unrelated living donor; emotionally related donor
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Gai, S. Giunti, G. Lanfranco, and G. P. Segoloni
Potential risks of living kidney donation a review
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 3122 - 3127.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. S. Clarke, S. Klarenbach, S. Vlaicu, R. C. Yang, A. X. Garg, and for the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR
The direct and indirect economic costs incurred by living kidney donors--a systematic review
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1952 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Lennerling, A. Forsberg, K. Meyer, and G. Nyberg
Motives for becoming a living kidney donor
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1600 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Tang, S. L. Lui, C. Y. Lo, W. K. Lo, I. K. P. Cheng, K. N. Lai, and T. M. Chan
Spousal renal donor transplantation in Chinese subjects: a 10 year experience from a single centre
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 203 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Stavrou, C. C. Deltas, T. C. Christophides, and A. Pierides
Outcome of kidney transplantation in autosomal dominant medullary cystic kidney disease type 1
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2165 - 2169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Voiculescu, K. Ivens, G. R. Hetzel, M. Hollenbeck, W. Sandmann, K. Grabitz, K. Balzer, F. Schneider, and B. Grabensee
Kidney transplantation from related and unrelated living donors in a single German centre
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 418 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.