Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irish, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irish, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 8 1680-1683, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


PRELIMINARY REPORTS

The factor V Leiden mutation and risk of renal vein thrombosis in patients with nephrotic syndrome

A Irish
Oxford Renal Unit, The Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK; Corresponding address: Department of Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital, GPO Box X2213, Perth, Western Australia, 6001, Australia

Background: Acquired abnormalities of coagulation and fibrinolysis in nephrotic syndrome have been implicated in the pathogenesis of renal vein thrombosis (RVT). Whether resistance to activated Protein C due to a mutation in the gene for factor V (FV Leiden/FV506Q, the commonest inherited risk factor for venous thrombosis) could contribute to risk of RT in patients with nephrotic syndrome is unknown. Method: Genotyping for the factor V Leiden mutation was undertaken in a retrospective study of 35 patients with a history of nephrotic syndrome, 10 of whom had suffered clinically significant and radiologically proven RVT. Results: Two patients (6%) were heterozygous for the FV506Q mutation, a prevalence similar to studies within the general population. One heterozygote had suffered a RVT, whilst the other without a native RVT subsequently had a primary renal allograft thrombosis. Conclusion: In a retrospective study the prevalence of the FV Leiden mutation was not increased in patients with nephrotic syndrome nor associated with prevalence of clinically significant RVT. Whilst this study was insufficiently powerful to fully exclude an association, it suggests acquired rather than inherited alterations in the coagulation/fibrinolytic balance associated with nephrosis may be of greater importance in venous thrombotic risk, and that routine screening of patients with nephrosis for this mutation will not identify the majority of patients at risk for RVT. Confirmation of these results and determining whether the natural history of thrombosis or underlying renal disease in carriers of the FV Leiden mutation differs from those without this mutation, will require a large prospective study. Keywords: Nephrotic syndrome; renal vein thrombosis; factor V Leiden mutation
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.