Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lindholm, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lindholm, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 6 1218-1222, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate increases net ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis

T Wang, A Qureshi, O Heimburger, J Waniewski, C Chen, J Bergstrom and B Lindholm
Divisions of Baxter Novum and Renal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, K-56, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, McGaw Park, IL USA; Corresponding author

Background. The surface-active substance dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate (DSS) has been reported to increase the peritoneal clearances of urea and creatinine. This study investigated the effects of DSS on the fluid and solute transport characteristics of the peritoneum. Design. A 4-h single-dwell experiment session of peritoneal dialysis using 25 ml of 3.86% glucose dialysis solution with an intraperitoneal volume maker was performed in 16 male Sprague-Dawley rats. In eight rats, 0.005% (50 p.p.m.) DSS was added to the dialysis fluid. No DSS was given to the other eight rats (control group). The transport of fluid, glucose, potassium, sodium, urea, phosphate and urate were analysed. Results. There was a significant increase in the intraperitoneal volume in the DSS group (33.0±2.9 ml) was significantly higher compared to the control group (28.8±2.1 ml. P<0.01). This increase in the drain volume was mainly due to a decrease in peritoneal fluid absorption rate in the DSS group (0.040±0.013 ml/min) as compared to the control group (0.054±0.010 ml/min, P0.05). There was no significant difference in the diffusive permeability and sieving coefficient for the small solutes between these two group. However, the clearances for urea and sodium were higher in the DSS group, mainly due to the increase in the dialysate volume. Conclusion. Our results suggest that DSS significantly increases the net ultrafiltration of peritoneal dialysis. This effect, which was mainly due to a decrease in the fluid absorption rate, contributed to the increased clearances for urea and sodium. DSS did not alter the diffusive permeability and sieving coefficient for the small solutes. Keywords: dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate; lymphatic absorption; peritoneal dialysis; ultrafiltration
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. F. FLESSNER, J. LOFTHOUSE, and A. WILLIAMS
Increasing Peritoneal Contact Area During Dialysis Improves Mass Transfer
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2001; 12(10): 2139 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. F. FLESSNER, J. LOFTHOUSE, and E. R. ZAKARIA
Improving Contact Area between the Peritoneum and Intraperitoneal Therapeutic Solutions
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2001; 12(4): 807 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.