Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, I. G.
Right arrow Articles by Walls, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, I. G.
Right arrow Articles by Walls, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 4 741-747, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Erythropoietin and sexual dysfunction

IG Lawrence, DE Price, TA Howlett, KP Harris, J Feehally and J Walls
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (rHuEpo) therapy has been shown to improve sexual function in the male dialysis population, with several studies suggesting a direct effect upon endocrine function, as well as correction of anaemia. Nevertheless many male dialysis patients receiving rHuEpo continue to complain of sexual dysfunction. METHODS: At a dedicated renal impotence clinic, 65 male dialysis patients were screened for endocrine disturbances. Baseline serum sex hormones were compared between those receiving and not receiving rHuEpo, using either the two-sample t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, after assessing for normality. Results from four patients were excluded on account of either medications (antiemetic phenothiazines), hepatic dysfunction, or carcinomatosis. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (41.0%) were receiving rHuEpo, the recipients and non-recipients being well matched for haemoglobin (10.19 +/- 0.29 vs 10.55 +/- 0.25 g/dl, n.s.), age (51.1 +/- 1.9 vs 53.6 +/- 2.1 years, n.s.) and duration of sexual dysfunction (median, 3.0 vs 3.0 years, n.s.). The rHuEpo recipients had a higher median creatinine (1090 vs 972 micromol/l, P < 0.02), but similar nutritional status to the non-recipients (albumin 41.0 vs 39.0 g/l, n.s.). The total duration of rHuEpo therapy was 0.85 +/- 0.14 years. Prolactin levels were similar in both the rHuEpo recipients and non- recipients (440 vs 541 mu/l, n.s.), as were LH (11.0 vs 10.5 iu/l, n.s.) and FSH (8.0 vs 6.5 iu/l, n.s.). However, there were significant elevations of testosterone (19.8 +/- 1.3 vs 16.1 +/- 1.1 nmol/l, P < 0.05) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) (40.5 vs 26.0 nmol/l, P < 0.01), with a trend toward elevated oestradiol (304 vs 248 pmol/l, P = 0.095) in the rHuEpo-treated group. Forty-eight subjects (78.7%) received peritoneal dialysis (PD), with the 19 rHuEpo recipients (39.6%) demonstrating increased serum testosterone (21.0 +/- 1.5 vs 16.6 +/- 1.3 nmol/l, P < 0.05), SHBG (40.5 vs 26.5 nmol/l, P < 0.01), LH (15.0 vs 10.0 iu/l, P < 0.01) and FSH (12.0 vs 5.3 iu/l, P < 0.05). These differences were not demonstrated in the 13 haemodialysis (HD) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Male dialysis patients complaining of sexual dysfunction after correction of anaemia with rHuEpo are characterized by higher levels of serum testosterone and SHBG, but not suppression of hyperprolactinaemia or hyperoestrogenism. Male PD subjects receiving rHuEpo also demonstrated increased LH and FSH.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Schmidt, A. Luger, and W. H. Horl
Sexual hormone abnormalities in male patients with renal failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 368 - 371.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.