Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vestergaard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lokkegaard, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vestergaard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lokkegaard, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 10 2117-2123, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Predicting future trends in the number of patients on renal replacement therapy in Denmark

P Vestergaard and H Lokkegaard
Danish National Registry, Danish Society of Nephrology; Corresponding author at: Afd.900, Aarhus Amtssygehus, Tage Hansens Gade 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Objectives: To predict the future prevalence of patients on renal replacement therapy due to chronic renal failure in Denmark.Subjects and methods: Four thousand and nine terminal uraemic patients (median age 50.0 years, 15.2% diabetic) were treated in Denmark with renal replacement therapy in the period 1 January 1991 to 31 December 1995. Incidence rates and rates of transition between the treatment modalities (haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation) were calculated. The prediction was made using a Markov model in three ways: (1) using the average rates (deterministic model), (2) using rates simulated with pseudorandom numbers based on the average rates (stochastic model), and (3) using increasing incidence rates in a deterministic model. Results: Using present rates both model types predicted a significant increase in the prevalence of renal transplant recipients (<60 years (from 1003 in 1995 to about 1465 in 2006) and the prevalence of haemodialysis patients ⩾60 years (from 456 in 1995 to about 903 in 2006) while the prevalence of other treatment modalities would change less dramatically. The overall prevalence proportion would increase from 539 patients per million population (p.m.p.) in 1995 to about 777 p.m.p. in 2006. The stochastic model clearly demonstrated the uncertainties linked to the prognosis in contrast to the deterministic model. The deterministic model with increasing rates predicted a prevalence proportion of 1162 p.m.p. in 2006. Conclusion: Even with present rates the prevalence of haemodialysis patients in Denmark will continue to increase. Mathematical models offers a good tool to study future trends and to plan future capacity. Keywords: kidney failure; Markov model; prognosis; renal replacement therapy
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Hommel, S. Rasmussen, M. Madsen, and A.-L. Kamper
The Danish Registry on Regular Dialysis and Transplantation:completeness and validity of incident patient registration
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 26, 2009; (2009) gfp571v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Jones, P. Roderick, S. Harris, and M. Rogerson
Decline in kidney function before and after nephrology referral and the effect on survival in moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2133 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. T. Gilbertson, J. Liu, J. L. Xue, T. A. Louis, C. A. Solid, J. P. Ebben, and A. J. Collins
Projecting the Number of Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States to the Year 2015
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2005; 16(12): 3736 - 3741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Roderick, R. Davies, C. Jones, T. Feest, S. Smith, and K. Farrington
Simulation model of renal replacement therapy: predicting future demand in England
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 692 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
Y. Murakami and Y. Ohashi
Projected number of diabetic renal disease patients among insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus children in Japan using a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 1078 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Berthoux, E. Jones, R. Gellert, S. Mendel, L. Saker, and D. Briggs
Epidemiological data of treated end-stage renal failure in the European Union (EU) during the year 1995: report of the European Renal Association Registry and the National Registries
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2332 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.