Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nevalainen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternack, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nevalainen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternack, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 1 145-150, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The influence of peritoneal dialysis and the use of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin on glucose metabolism and serum lipids in type 1 diabetic patients

P Nevalainen, J Lahtela, J Mustonen and A Pasternack
Department of Medicine, University of Tampere, and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Corresponding author at: Department of Medicine, University of Tampere, PO Box 607, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland

Background. Intraperitoneally administered insulin is regarded as the most physiological replacement therapy, leading to lower peripheral insulin concentrations and equal or better glycaemic control than subcutaneous insulin. This two-part study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of CAPD, as well as the use of subcutaneous vs. intraperitoneal insulin on insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control and serum lipids in type 1 diabetes. Methods. Eleven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure participated the studies. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp, serum lipids, and patient well-being were measured. During CAPD all patients were first treated with subcutaneous insulin and then with intraperitoneal insulin. The metabolic studies were repeated after both treatment periods for at least 3 months. Metabolic studies were performed on six of the patients also before initiation of CAPD. Results. HbA1c rose after the initiation of CAPD (from 8.85±0.54% to 9.58±0.66%, NS) and improved after changing from subcutaneous to intraperitoneally administered insulin (from 9.49±0.43% to 8.13±0.39%, P<0.01). Insulin dose increased by 15% after initiation of CAPD and 128% after switching for subcutaneous to intraperitoneal insulin. Glucose disposal rate enhanced by 39% (P=0.05) and 14% respectively (P <0.01). Initiation of CAPD had no significant effects on serum lipids but intraperitoneally administered insulin reduced HDL cholesterol and increased LDL/HDL ratio significantly. Conclusions. Intraperitoneal insulin therapy offers better glycaemic control and insulin sensitivity than subcutaneous insulin. Deterioration of HbA1c after initiation of CAPD while patients remained on subcutaneous insulin may be partly due to absorbed energy from the dialysate. Intraperitoneal insulin therapy seems to have detrimental effects on serum lipids. The clinical significance in modifying the risk of atherosclerosis remains unclear. Keywords: CAPD, glucose metabolism; intraperitoneal insulin; insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; lipoproteins; uraemia
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C.-C. Szeto, K.-M. Chow, C.-B. Leung, B. C.-H. Kwan, K.-Y. Chung, M.-C. Law, and P. K.-T. Li
Increased subcutaneous insulin requirements in diabetic patients recently commenced on peritoneal dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1697 - 1702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.