Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (55)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by World, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rainford, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by World, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rainford, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1996) 11: 614-621
© 1996 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Mesalazine-associated interstitial nephritis

M. J. World1,, P. E. Stevens2, M. A. Ashton3 and D. J. Rainford2

1Royal Army Medical College Millbank, London 2Department of Renal Medicine, Princess Mary's Royal Air Force Hospital Halton Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK 3Royal Air Force Institute of Pathology and Tropical Medicine, Royal Air Force Halton Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: M. J. World BSc, MD, FRCP, Professor of Military Medicine, Royal Army Medical College, 45 Millbank, London SW1P 4RJ, UK

BACKGROUND.: When used for oral treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, Asacol (a coated form of mesalazine = 5-aminosalicylic acid) can cause interstitial nephritis. The spectrum of severity, frequency of occurrence and the best renal function test to detect this complication are not known. The value of immunosuppression in addition to drug withdrawal is similarly undetermined.

METHODS.: Four cases of interstitial nephritis which occurred in association with oral Asacol treatment are presented and a further 12 cases who received similar treatment are reviewed. Clinical trials published previously were scrutinized to assess the frequency of impaired renal function.

RESULTS.: The available evidence suggests that renal impairment of any severity may occur in up to 1 in 100 patients, but that clinically significant interstitial nephritis occurs in less than 1 in 500 patients. This is most reliably detected by an elevated serum creatinine concentration. If the diagnosis of nephrotoxicity is delayed until 18 months after commencement of medication, restoration of renal function, which is seen on withdrawal of medication alone up to 10 months, does not occur and there is no evidence to date to indicate that addition of immunosuppression confers any significant advantage at this later stage.

CONCLUSIONS.: It is suggested that serum creatinine concentration should be measured each month for the first 3 months of treatment, 3-monthly for the remainder of the first year and annually thereafter. The use of concurrent immunosuppressive therapy may necessitate extension to the period of intensive monitoring. Any elevation of serum creatinine which cannot be related to a relapse of inflammatory bowel disease should prompt immediate withdrawal of Asacol and related medications and substitution of alternative therapy. Neither the lack of urinary abnormalities on routine testing nor the absence of clinical or laboratory features of drug allergy can be relied upon to rule out interstitial nephritis during oral therapy with these drugs.

Keywords: mesalazine (Asacol); inflammatory bowel disease; interstitial nephritis; monitoring renal function; lack of urinary abnormalities


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in GastroenterologyHome page
S. Garud and M. A. Peppercorn
Review: Ulcerative colitis: current treatment strategies and future prospects
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 99 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
G D'Haens and A A van Bodegraven
Mesalazine is safe for the treatment of IBD
Gut, January 1, 2004; 53(1): 155 - 155.
[Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
R A J Ransford and M J S Langman
Sulphasalazine and mesalazine: serious adverse reactions re-evaluated on the basis of suspected adverse reaction reports to the Committee on Safety of Medicines
Gut, October 1, 2002; 51(4): 536 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
N. Benador, P. Grimm, J. Lemire, W. Griswold, G. Billman, and V. Reznik
Interstitial Nephritis in Children with Crohn's Disease
Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 39(4): 253 - 254.
[PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. S Rampton
Regular review: Management of Crohn's disease
BMJ, December 4, 1999; 319(7223): 1480 - 1485.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Popoola, A. F Muller, L. Pollock, P. O'Donnell, P. Carmichael, and P. Stevens
Lesson of the week: Late onset interstitial nephritis associated with mesalazine treatment
BMJ, September 19, 1998; 317(7161): 795 - 797.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.