Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nabokov, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nabokov, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1996) 11: 514-520
© 1996 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Influence of specific and non-specific endothelin receptor antagonists on renal morphology in rats with surgical renal ablation

A. Nabokov1,2,, K. Amann2, J. Wagner1, F. Gehlen1, K. Münter3 and E. Ritz1

1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg Ludwigshafen, Rhein, Germany 2Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg Ludwigshafen, Rhein, Germany 3Knoll AG Ludwigshafen, Rhein, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: A. Nabokov, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Strasse 56a, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany

BACKGROUND.: Studies in experimental models of chronic renal failure suggest an important role for the endothelin system in the development of renal scarring. Endothelin receptor (ETR) anatagonists interfere with progression, but it has not been resolved (i) whether this is true for all models of renal damage, (ii) to what extent the effect is modulated by systemic blood pressure and (iii) whether the effect is similar for ETAR and ETA/ETBR antagonists.

STUDY DESIGN.: 5/6 subtotal nephrectomy (SNX) by surgical ablation in male Sprague—Dawley rats. Comparison of ACE inhibitor Trandolapril (0.1 mg/kg/day), ETAR antagonist BMS 182874 (30 mg/kg/day) and ETAR/ETBR antagonist Ro 46-2005 (30 mg/kg/day) by gavage. Duration of the experiment eight weeks.

METHODS.: Systolic blood pressure by tail plethysmography. Perfusion fixation of kidneys and morphometric analysis ET-1 and ETA/ETBR by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS.: SNX caused a significant (P<0.01) increase of systolic blood pressure (170±8.6 mmHg) compared to sham operated controls (131±5.3 mmHg). Blood pressure was significantly (P<0.001) lower with Trandolapril (128±5.3 mmHg), but not with BMS 182874 (153±5.9 mmHg) or Ro 46-2005 (167±7.6 mmHg). Compared to sham operated rats (0.03±0.01) glomerulosclerosis index (GSI) was significantly (P<0.01) higher in the untreated SNX group (0.9±0.15). Significantly lower GSI was found in Trandolapril treated (0.29±0.04), BMS 182874 treated (0.36±0.05), and Ro 46-2005 treated animals (0.45±0.11). The effect of BMS 182874 was accompanied by lower tubulointerstitial damage index. Mean glomerular volume was dramatically increased (P<0.001) in SNX rats as compared to sham operated animals. This glomerular enlargement was partially prevented by Trandolapril (P<0.05), but not by either ETR antagonist. ET-1 mRNA tended to be higher in SNX irrespective of treatment, while ETAR and ETBR mRNA were significantly lower.

CONCLUSION.: Both specific (ETAR) and non-specific (ETA/ETBR) endothelin antagonists interfere with development of glomeruloscierosis by mechanisms which are, at least in part, independent of systemic blood pressure.

Keywords: glomerular hypertrophy; glomerulosclerosis; endothelin receptor antagonist; renal failure; subtotal nephrectomy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
N. Dhaun, J. Goddard, and DavidJ. Webb
The Endothelin System and Its Antagonism in Chronic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 943 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. Hohenstein, L. Kasperek, D.-J. Kobelt, C. Daniel, S. Gambaryan, T. Renne, U. Walter, K. U. Amann, and C. P.M. Hugo
Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein-Deficient Mice Demonstrate Increased Platelet Activation but Improved Renal Endothelial Preservation and Regeneration in Passive Nephrotoxic Nephritis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 986 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
I. LEHRKE, R. WALDHERR, E. RITZ, and J. WAGNER
Renal Endothelin-1 and Endothelin Receptor Type B Expression in Glomerular Diseases with Proteinuria
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2001; 12(11): 2321 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. AMANN, K. MÜNTER, S. WESSELS, J. WAGNER, V. BALAJEW, S. HERGENRÖDER, G. MALL, and E. RITZ
Endothelin A Receptor Blockade Prevents Capillary/Myocyte Mismatch in the Heart of Uremic Animals
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2000; 11(9): 1702 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. AMANN, L. C. RUMP, A. SIMONAVICIENE, V. OBERHAUSER, S. WESSELS, S. R. ORTH, M.-L. GROSS, A. KOCH, G. W. BIELENBERG, J. P. VAN KATS, et al.
Effects of Low Dose Sympathetic Inhibition on Glomerulosclerosis and Albuminuria in Subtotally Nephrectomized Rats
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2000; 11(8): 1469 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. Brochu, S. Lacasse-M., C. Moreau, M. Lebel, I. Kingma, J. H. Grose, and R. Lariviere
Endothelin ETA receptor blockade prevents the progression of renal failure and hypertension in uraemic rats
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 1999; 14(8): 1881 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. BROCHU, S. LACASSE-M, R. LARIVIÈRE, I. KINGMA, J. H. GROSE, and M. LEBEL
Differential Effects of Endothelin-1 Antagonists on Erythropoietin-Induced Hypertension in Renal Failure
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 1999; 10(7): 1440 - 1446.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
F. RUSCHITZKA, S. SHAW, D. GYGI, G. NOLL, M. BARTON, and T. F. LÜSCHER
Endothelial Dysfunction in Acute Renal Failure: Role of Circulatingand Tissue Endothelin-1
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 1999; 10(5): 953 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. R. ORTH, G. ODONI, K. AMANN, P. STRZELCZYK, M. RASCHACK, and E. RITZ
The ETA Receptor Blocker LU 135252 Prevents Chronic Transplant Nephropathy in the "Fisher to Lewis" Model
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 1999; 10(2): 387 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. R. Orth, J. P. Esslinger, K. Amann, U. Schwarz, M. Raschack, and E. Ritz
Nephroprotection of an ETA-Receptor Blocker (LU 135252) in Salt-Loaded Uninephrectomized Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, April 1, 1998; 31(4): 995 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.