Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchshuber, A.
Right arrow Articles by Querfeld, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuchshuber, A.
Right arrow Articles by Querfeld, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1996) 11: 468-473
© 1996 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Pneumococcal vaccine in children and young adults with chronic renal disease

A. Fuchshuber1,, O. Kühnemund2, B. Keuth1, R. Lütticken2, D. Michalk1 and U. Querfeld1

1University Children's Hospital of Cologne, University Hospital of Aachen Germany 2Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Aachen Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Arno Fuchshuber MD, INSERM U423, Hôpital Necker, Enfants Malades, 149, rue de Sevres, 75743 Paris Cedex 15, France

BACKGROUND.: Pneumococcal vaccination has been recommended for immunocompromised children over 2 years including patients with chronic renal disease. However, the effect of vaccination and revaccination is variable and the indication for immunization is a subject of controversy.

METHODS.: Forty children and young adults with chronic renal diseases (including the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, chronic renal failure, patients undergoing dialysis and after transplantation) were vaccinated with a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine. The efficacy of the vaccine was evaluated by measuring antibody titres before and 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after vaccination. Twenty-two patients were submitted to a revaccination 1 year after the first vaccination.

RESULTS.: A sufficient immune response, defined as an at least fourfold increase of postvaccinal antibody titres and an antibody titre >200, was observed in 83% of the patients 4 weeks after vaccination, but only in 68% after 6 months, and in 48% after 1 year. Revaccination produced a significant immune response in 11/22 patients (50%) followed by a rapid decline of antibody levels within 6 months. Both vaccinations were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS.: The currently available vaccine is without major side-effects and effective in producing a significant immune response. Antibody levels should be monitored in vaccinated patients with chronic renal diseases considering the rapid decline as early as 6 months after vaccination. Evaluation of the efficacy of revaccination in these patients requires further investigations.

Keywords: renal failure; Streptococcus pneumoniae; vaccination


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
L. S. Dalrymple and A. S. Go
Epidemiology of Acute Infections among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1487 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Janus, L.-V. Vacher, S. Karie, E. Ledneva, and G. Deray
Vaccination and chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 800 - 807.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
The place of pneumococcal vaccination
DTB, October 1, 1998; 36(10): 73 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. R. Orth and E. Ritz
The Nephrotic Syndrome
N. Engl. J. Med., April 23, 1998; 338(17): 1202 - 1211.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.