Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carraro, M.
Right arrow Articles by Faccini, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carraro, M.
Right arrow Articles by Faccini, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1996) 11: 444-448
© 1996 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Dose effect of nitrendipine on urinary enzymes and microproteins following non-ionic radiocontrast administration

M. Carraro1,, W. Mancini1, M. Artero1, F. Stacul2, M. Grotto2, M. Cova2 and L. Faccini1

1Institute of Medicina Clinica, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara Trieste, Italy 2Institute of Radiology, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara Trieste, Italy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr M. Carraro, Istituto di Medicina Clinica, Ospedale di Cattinara, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy

BACKGROUND.: Although calcium-channel antagonists have been proposed as prophylaxis to prevent radiocontrast-induced nephropathy, the dose and dose interval to achieve a protective effect have not been quantified in humans.

METHODS.: In a randomized, double-blind protocol we studied urinary enzyme and microprotein excretion in 121 outpatients (mean age 65.3 ±9.3 years, 62% male) with normal renal function who were to undergo digital subtraction arteriography with iohexol or iopentol. The subjects were treated with a single dose of placebo (group 1) or nitrendipine 10 mg (group 2) or 20 mg (group 3) p.o. 1 h before the procedure. Blood and urine samples were collected 1 h before, 1 h after, and 24 h after contrast administration. Study variables included contrast volume and serum creatinine, and urinary creatinine, osmolality, albumin, alanylaminopeptidase (AAP, a brush border enzyme), N-acetyl-ß-glucosaminidase (NAG, a lysosomal enzyme), and {alpha}-1-microglobulin ({alpha}-1-micro, a filtered microprotein).

RESULTS.: Serum values of creatinine remained unchanged during the study period. Albuminuria was not affected by contrast administration, whereas AAP, NAG, and {alpha}-1-micro increased significantly, all except AAP returning to baseline at 24 h. Pretreatment with nitrendipine did not reduce enzyme excretion, although AAP levels were lower in general in the group assigned to the 20-mg dose. Acute renal failure, defined as a 50% increase of serum creatinine 24 h after radiocontrast administration, was found in eight patients: four from group 1 (8.3%), three from group 2 (6.5%), and one from group 3 (3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS.: Neither the course of enzyme excretion nor the incidence of acute renal failure following radiocontrast administration were affected by single doses of calcium antagonists. AAP levels were lower in general in subjects taking the 20-mg dose of nitrendipine. This study also indicates that a single low or normal dose of nitrendipine per os is not effective prophylaxis before radiocontrast administration. The designs of future studies investigating the ‘nephroprotective’ effect of calcium-channel antagonists per os should incorporate (1) the use of repeated doses to saturate hepatic metabolic pathways, and (2) the control of confounding variables in the measurement of urinary enzymes.

Keywords: radiocontrast-induced nephropathy; calcium-channel antagonists; urinary enzymes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. S. Waikar, K. D. Liu, and G. M. Chertow
Diagnosis, Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 844 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Toprak, M. Cirit, M. Tanrisev, C. Yazici, O. Canoz, M. Sipahioglu, A. Uzum, R. Ersoy, and E. Y. Sozmen
Preventive effect of nebivolol on contrast-induced nephropathy in rats
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 853 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. Pannu, N. Wiebe, M. Tonelli, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
Prophylaxis Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
JAMA, June 21, 2006; 295(23): 2765 - 2779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Maeder, M. Klein, T. Fehr, and H. Rickli
Contrast nephropathy: Review focusing on prevention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1763 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
A. S. Gami and V. D. Garovic
Contrast Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography
Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2004; 79(2): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. L. M. Esnault
Radiocontrast media-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with renal failure: rationale for a new double-blind, prospective, randomized trial testing calcium channel antagonists
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1362 - 1364.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huber, K. Ilgmann, M. Page, M. Hennig, U. Schweigart, B. Jeschke, L. Lutilsky, W. Weiss, H. Salmhofer, and M. Classen
Effect of Theophylline on Contrast Material-induced Nephropathy in Patients with Chronic Renal Insufficiency: Controlled, Randomized, Double-blinded Study
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 772 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
Y-X J Wang, Y-F Jia, K-M Chen, and S K Morcos
Radiographic contrast media induced nephropathy: experimental observations and the protective effect of calcium channel blockers
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2001; 74(888): 1103 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. L. Haylor and S. K. Morcos
An oral ETA-selective endothelin receptor antagonist for contrast nephropathy?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1336 - 1337.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.