Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howie, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howie, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1995) 10: 2212-2218
© 1995 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Measurement of proliferation in renal biopsy specimens: evidence of subclinical tubular damage in the nephrotic syndrome

A. J. Howie1,, D. C. Rowlands1, G. M. Reynolds1 and A. D. Barnes2

1Department of Pathology, University of Birmingham Birmingham, UK 2Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr A. J. Howie, Department of Pathology, The Medical School, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

BACKGROUND: Proliferating cells can be detected in histological material in various ways. This investigation was to study the feasibility and usefulness of application of proliferation markers to routine renal biopsy specimens.

METHODS: One hundred and thirteen renal biopsies fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin were studied immunohistologically using antibody MIB 1, which recognises the Ki-67 antigen. Twenty-two biopsies were also immunostained with antibody PC 10 against proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

RESULTS: PC 10 stained nuclei in all biopsies, including those that were negative with MIB 1. MIB 1 stained nuclei in endocapillary sites to various extents, and there was an average of less than one stained endocapillary nucleus per glomerulus in biopsies with IgA nephropathy and IgM nephropathy, conventionally regarded as types of proliferative glomerulonephritis. Glomerular extracapillary nuclei were stained by MIB 1 in vasculitic disorders and at the site of tip changes. MIB 1 also stained nuclei in the arterial intima, especially in vascular rejection, and in interstitial tissues, correlating with renal excretory function. Tubular nuclei stained by MIB 1 were common in biopsies from patients with renal impairment and in a group with the nephrotic syndrome, in many of whom renal function was normal.

CONCLUSIONS: The main conclusions are that (1) immu-nohistological markers of proliferation can be applied to routine renal biopsy material; (2) PC 10 appears to overestimate proliferation compared with MIB 1; and (3) there is evidence of subclinical tubular damage in the nephrotic syndrome, shown by increased tubular proliferation without clinical renal impairment. This observation seems not to have been made previously.

Keywords: nephrotic syndrome; proliferation; renal biopsy; tubular damage


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. K. Rangan and J. D. Coombes
Renoprotective effects of sirolimus in non-immune initiated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2175 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. E. Thomas, K. P. G. Harris, J. Walls, P. N. Furness, and N. J. Brunskill
Fatty acids exacerbate tubulointerstitial injury in protein-overload proteinuria
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): F640 - F647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.